Literature DB >> 12714540

Socioeconomic status and breast cancer in Denmark.

Hella Danø1, Otto Andersen, Marianne Ewertz, Jørgen Holm Petersen, Elsebeth Lynge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women and the incidence has increased over time. Our objectives were to study: (1) the socioeconomic differences in breast cancer incidence and mortality in Denmark, (2) how different socioeconomic groups have contributed to the increasing incidence, (3) whether the diverging trend between breast cancer incidence and mortality reflects different socioeconomic distributions of breast cancer cases and breast cancer deaths, and (4) to compare measures of socioeconomic status based on own and spouses' occupation, respectively. We addressed these questions by studying the socioeconomic distribution of breast cancer incidence and breast cancer mortality in Danish women during the last 25 years.
METHODS: In all 1 402 225 women in Denmark were individually followed up for death, emigration, and incident breast cancer in 1970-1995. Of the 1 402 225 women included in the study, 730 549 were economically active in 1970, and 480 379 women were both married and economically active. Socioeconomic status was assessed based on the occupation in 1970.
RESULTS: For all women classified by their own socioeconomic group, the standardized incidence (SIR) and the standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were highest in academics (SIR = 1.39, SMR = 1.29), and lowest in women in agriculture (SIR = 0.77, SMR = 0.75). For married, economically active women classified by their own socioeconomic group the SIR and SMR were highest in academics (SIR = 1.40, SMR = 1.44) and lowest in women in agriculture (SIR = 0.76, SMR = 0.76). Classified by their husbands' socioeconomic group, the SIR and SMR were highest in women married to academics (SIR = 1.21, SMR = 1.16) and lowest in women married to men in agriculture (SIR = 0.79, SMR = 0.79). From 1970 to 1995, the risk of developing breast cancer increased by 38% in women aged 50-64. All social groups contributed to this increase, the increase being 45% in unskilled workers, and 26% in academics.
CONCLUSION: During the last quarter of the 20th century academics had the highest risk of breast cancer in Denmark. The size of the social gradient in breast cancer occurrence depended on the measure used. The time trends in social distribution will result in breast cancer becoming more frequent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12714540     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  23 in total

1.  Breast Cancer and Socioeconomic Status in Austria.

Authors:  Ursula Kunze; Gabriela Böhm
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Race, immigrant status, and cancer among women in the United States.

Authors:  James Ted McDonald; Jeremiah Neily
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-02

3.  Lifelong socioeconomic trajectory and premature mortality (35-65 years) in France: findings from the GAZEL Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Melchior; L F Berkman; I Kawachi; N Krieger; M Zins; S Bonenfant; M Goldberg
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Job Authority and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tetyana Pudrovska
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2013

5.  Mammographic density and markers of socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zoe Aitken; Kate Walker; Bernardine H Stegeman; Petra A Wark; Sue M Moss; Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  "Done more for me in a fortnight than anybody done in all me life." How welfare rights advice can help people with cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Moffatt; Emma Noble; Catherine Exley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Mammography Adherence in African-American Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy Stump; Susan M Rawl; Celette Sugg Skinner; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-02

8.  Higher-status occupations and breast cancer: a life-course stress approach.

Authors:  Tetyana Pudrovska; Deborah Carr; Michael McFarland; Caitlyn Collins
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  How do women value work shortly after breast cancer surgery and are their valuations associated with being on sick leave?

Authors:  Lena-Marie Petersson; Marie I Nilsson; Kristina Alexanderson; Mariann Olsson; Agneta Wennman-Larsen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

10.  Social inequalities in breast cancer mortality among French women: disappearing educational disparities from 1968 to 1996.

Authors:  G Menvielle; A Leclerc; J-F Chastang; D Luce
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.