Literature DB >> 12713940

Inbreeding, maternal care and genomic imprinting.

Jon F Wilkins1, David Haig.   

Abstract

Inactivation of expression of the paternal allele at two maternally silent imprinted loci has recently been reported to diminish the quality of care that female mice lavish on their offspring. This suggests that there can be disagreement between the maternally and paternally derived genomes of mothers over how much care for offspring is appropriate, with the paternally derived genome favoring greater care. The reason for such disagreement is not obvious because the maternally and paternally derived alleles at a locus have equal probabilities of being transmitted to each of the mother's ova and, therefore, would appear to have equal interests in a mother's offspring. However, if a female mates with a related male, her two alleles may have different probabilities of being present in the sperm that fertilize her ova. Natural selection can favor silencing of the maternally derived allele at a locus that enhances the quality of maternal care if the average patrilineal relatedness between a female and her mates decreases more rapidly than the average matrilineal relatedness. Just such an asymmetrical decrease in relatedness over time would be expected in a structured population in which patrilineal inbreeding is more common than matrilineal inbreeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12713940     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  13 in total

Review 1.  Coadaptation and conflict, misconception and muddle, in the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  D Haig
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  X- and Y-chromosome linked paternal effects on a life-history trait.

Authors:  Urban Friberg; Andrew D Stewart; William R Rice
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Intragenomic conflict over bet-hedging.

Authors:  Jon F Wilkins; Tanmoy Bhattacharya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-II contribute differentially to the phenotype of pregnancy associated plasma protein-A knock-out mice.

Authors:  Emily J Mason; Jacquelyn A Grell; Junxiang Wan; Pinchas Cohen; Cheryl A Conover
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.372

5.  Genomic imprinting and the evolutionary psychology of human kinship.

Authors:  David Haig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  The role of genomic imprinting in biology and disease: an expanding view.

Authors:  Jo Peters
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  Non coding RNAs and viruses in the framework of the phylogeny of the genes, epigenesis and heredity.

Authors:  Daniel Frías-Lasserre
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 9.  Genomic imprinting in mammals: emerging themes and established theories.

Authors:  Andrew J Wood; Rebecca J Oakey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genomic imprinting of Grb10: coadaptation or conflict?

Authors:  Jon F Wilkins
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.