OBJECTIVES: to assess intra- and interobserver variability in the measurement of aortic and common iliac artery diameter by means of computed tomography (CT). DESIGN: reproducibility study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: three radiologists performed measurements of aortic diameter at five different levels and of both common iliac arteries with CT. Fifty-nine subjects were examined, 29 with and 30 without abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) as assessed by ultrasound. RESULTS: intraobserver variability varied between radiologists, measurement plane (anterior-posterior vs transverse) and measurement level. The interobserver variability was markedly higher at the bifurcation than at the suprarenal level and higher than intraobserver variability for measurements at all levels. Both intraobserver and interobserver variability increased with increasing vessel diameter and were largest in patients with AAA. The absolute intraobserver difference of the maximal infrarenal aortic diameter was 2mm or less in 94% of intraobserver pairs. The corresponding interobserver difference was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: interobserver variability of CT measurements of aortic and common iliac artery diameter is not negligible and should be taken into account when making clinical decisions. When assessing change in aortic diameter, previous CT-scans should be reviewed simultaneously as a routine to exclude interobserver variability.
OBJECTIVES: to assess intra- and interobserver variability in the measurement of aortic and common iliac artery diameter by means of computed tomography (CT). DESIGN: reproducibility study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: three radiologists performed measurements of aortic diameter at five different levels and of both common iliac arteries with CT. Fifty-nine subjects were examined, 29 with and 30 without abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) as assessed by ultrasound. RESULTS: intraobserver variability varied between radiologists, measurement plane (anterior-posterior vs transverse) and measurement level. The interobserver variability was markedly higher at the bifurcation than at the suprarenal level and higher than intraobserver variability for measurements at all levels. Both intraobserver and interobserver variability increased with increasing vessel diameter and were largest in patients with AAA. The absolute intraobserver difference of the maximal infrarenal aortic diameter was 2mm or less in 94% of intraobserver pairs. The corresponding interobserver difference was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: interobserver variability of CT measurements of aortic and common iliac artery diameter is not negligible and should be taken into account when making clinical decisions. When assessing change in aortic diameter, previous CT-scans should be reviewed simultaneously as a routine to exclude interobserver variability.
Authors: Henk A Marquering; Jouke Dijkstra; Patrick J H de Koning; Berend C Stoel; Johan H C Reiber Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Nathan K Itoga; Kara A Rothenberg; Paola Suarez; Thuy-Vy Ho; Matthew W Mell; Baohui Xu; Catherine M Curtin; Ronald L Dalman Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Hye Jeong Kim; Dae Young Yoon; Eun Soo Kim; Hyung Jin Lee; Hong Jun Jeon; Jong Young Lee; Byung-Moon Cho Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-03-25 Impact factor: 2.804