Literature DB >> 12713239

Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention.

Nilli Lavie1, Jan W de Fockert.   

Abstract

The effects of perceptual load and those of target-stimulus degradation on distractor processing were contrasted. Targets either had to be found among several nontargets (high perceptual load) or were presented alone and were intact (low perceptual load), had reduced size and contrast (Experiment 1), had reduced duration and were followed by a mask (Experiment 2), or had reduced visual acuity owing to position eccentricity (Experiment 3) in the degraded low-load condition. The results showed that both high perceptual load and target degradation increased general task difficulty, as is reflected by overall reaction times and accuracy. However, whereas high perceptual load reduced response-competition effects of irrelevant distractors, target degradation increased distractor effects. These results support the hypothesis that distractor processing depends on the extent to which high perceptual load exhausts attention in relevant processing and provide a dissociation between perceptual load and general task difficulty and processing speed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12713239     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  36 in total

1.  Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dissociable effects of bottom-up and top-down factors on the processing of unattended fearful faces.

Authors:  Shen-Mou Hsu; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Paola Finoia; Antonino Raffone; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Is there a limit to the superiority of individuals with ASD in visual search?

Authors:  Roy S Hessels; Ignace T C Hooge; Tineke M Snijders; Chantal Kemner
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-02

7.  Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.

Authors:  Chunhong He; Antao Chen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-08-04

8.  On the interdependence of cognition and emotion.

Authors:  Justin Storbeck; Gerald L Clore
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2007

9.  Graspable Objects Grab Attention More Than Images Do.

Authors:  Michael A Gomez; Rafal M Skiba; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-12-07

10.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.