Literature DB >> 12712037

Generic evaluation methods for disaster drills in developing countries.

Gary B Green1, Surbhi Modi, Kevin Lunney, Tamara L Thomas.   

Abstract

Disaster simulations (drills) are widely used throughout the world and are considered a fundamental tool for evaluation and improvement of local disaster response capacity. Despite this, no generally accepted methodology exists for quantitative evaluation of the medical response to a disaster drill. We therefore set out to develop and prospectively test a comprehensive method to assess both medical provider and organizational performance during a disaster simulation. Because disasters disproportionately affect the populations of developing countries, we designed these methods to be sufficiently flexible to be applicable in both the developed and the developing world. Objective outcome measures were identified for each component of disaster medical response and were incorporated into 3 data collection instruments. The derived methods were applied to a multiagency disaster simulation in Guatemala City, Guatemala. On the basis of this pilot study, suggested modifications and recommendations were made. The ability to objectively identify the specific strengths and weaknesses of an emergency medical services systems' medical response to a disaster is an important step toward optimizing system performance. On the basis of our experience, we recommend the incorporation of objective evaluation methods such as these into every disaster simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12712037     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2003.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  8 in total

1.  Patient tracking in earthquake emergency response in Iran: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Nahid Tavakoli; Mohammad H Yarmohammadian; Reza Safdari; Mahmoud Keyvanara
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2017

2.  The Value of Functional Exercise in Pediatric Mass- Casualty Incident Training.

Authors:  Wei-Kuo Chou; Chien-Hao Lin; Ming-Tai Cheng; Yun-Chang Chen; Fuh-Yuan Shih
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2019-09-01

3.  Facilitators and obstacles in pre-hospital medical response to earthquakes: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Djalali; Hamidreza Khankeh; Gunnar Öhlén; Maaret Castrén; Lisa Kurland
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Systematic literature review of templates for reporting prehospital major incident medical management.

Authors:  Sabina Fattah; Marius Rehn; Eirik Reierth; Torben Wisborg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Benefits, barriers, and limitations on the use of Hospital Incident Command System.

Authors:  Shahin Shooshtari; Shahram Tofighi; Shirin Abbasi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Monitoring and evaluation of disaster response efforts undertaken by local health departments: a rapid realist review.

Authors:  Kate Gossip; Hebe Gouda; Yong Yi Lee; Sonja Firth; Raoul Bermejo; Willibald Zeck; Eliana Jimenez Soto
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Search without rescue? Evaluating the international search and rescue response to earthquake disasters.

Authors:  Anna Rom; Ilan Kelman
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-12

8.  A Qualitative Study on Researchers' Experiences after Publishing Scientific Reports on Major Incidents, Mass-Casualty Incidents, and Disasters.

Authors:  Johannes Nordsteien Svensøy; Helene Nilsson; Rune Rimstad
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.040

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.