Literature DB >> 12711940

Augmentation of the craniomaxillofacial region using porous hydroxyapatite granules.

Andrea Moreira-Gonzalez1, Ian T Jackson, Takeshi Miyawaki, Vincent DiNick, Reha Yavuzer.   

Abstract

Augmentation of the craniomaxillofacial region is required for many aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. A variety of different materials and techniques have been used. Coralline hydroxyapatite has proved to have biocompatible properties as a bone graft substitute. This study further analyzes the use of porous coral-derived hydroxyapatite granules in craniomaxillofacial augmentation for cosmetic and reconstructive purposes and evaluates the long-term clinical result. This retrospective study reviewed the use of porous coral-derived hydroxyapatite granules over a 20-year period, between 1981 and 2001, in 180 patients, in whom 393 procedures were performed. The surgical technique is described and discussed. Statistical significance was evaluated by descriptive statistics and the correlation bivariate Spearman's test (p > 0.05). For 61.6 percent of the procedures, the surgical indication was reconstructive and in 38.4 percent, cosmetic. The maxilla was the most common site of surgery (44.3 percent), followed by the mandible (21.6 percent) and zygoma (15.4 percent). The complication rate was 5.6 percent (n = 22 of 393), with contour irregularities being responsible for 59 percent (n = 13 of 22). Both infection and granule extrusion were responsible for 1.3 percent of the complications. Good results were achieved in 96.4 percent of the procedures. Porous coral-derived hydroxyapatite granules have shown considerable efficacy and versatility in craniofacial contour refinement and augmentation. They are stable, biocompatible, and safe. A sterile technique is advised, with care taken not to tear the periosteum in the pocket design and with subperiosteal placement of the granules, compaction of the granules at the site, overcorrection of 15 percent of the required total volume, watertight closure, and postoperative taping to prevent mobilization. The correct surgical indications and adherence to the principles stated above will result in a very satisfactory long-term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711940     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000055432.20074.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles as Injectable Bone Substitute Material in a Vertical Bone Augmentation Model.

Authors:  Aoi Kaneko; Eriko Marukawa; Hiroyuki Harada
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.

Authors:  Naoto Saito; Hisao Haniu; Yuki Usui; Kaoru Aoki; Kazuo Hara; Seiji Takanashi; Masayuki Shimizu; Nobuyo Narita; Masanori Okamoto; Shinsuke Kobayashi; Hiroki Nomura; Hiroyuki Kato; Naoyuki Nishimura; Seiichi Taruta; Morinobu Endo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Ceramic and non-ceramic hydroxyapatite as a bone graft material: a brief review.

Authors:  S R Dutta; D Passi; P Singh; A Bhuibhar
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  The fate of porous hydroxyapatite granules used in facial skeletal augmentation.

Authors:  Bryan C Mendelson; Steve R Jacobson; Alain M Lavoipierre; Richard J Huggins
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 5.  Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation.

Authors:  Bryan Mendelson; Chin-Ho Wong
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Cryptogenic Temporal Hollowing.

Authors:  Ie Hyon Park; Heeyeon Kwon; Sang Wha Kim
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-12-23

7.  A randomized comparative prospective study of platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, and hydroxyapatite as a graft material for mandibular third molar extraction socket healing.

Authors:  Shubha Ranjan Dutta; Deepak Passi; Purnima Singh; Sarang Sharma; Mahinder Singh; Dhirendra Srivastava
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

8.  Aesthetic Enhancement of the Brow using Hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Lennert Minelli; Jacqueline Richa; Bryan C Mendelson
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Soft Tissue Malar Modifications after Zygomatic Valgization Osteotomy via Geometrical Descriptors.

Authors:  Elena Carlotta Olivetti; Federica Marcolin; Sandro Moos; Alberto Ferrando; Enrico Vezzetti; Umberto Autorino; Claudia Borbon; Emanuele Zavattero; Giovanni Gerbino; Guglielmo Ramieri
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-03-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.