Literature DB >> 12711811

Reduced meiotic fitness in hybrids with heterozygosity for heterochromatin in the speciating Mus terricolor complex.

Tikaram Sharma1, Amit Bardhan, Min Bahadur.   

Abstract

Mus terricolor I, II and III are the three chromosomal species which differ in stable autosomal short-arm heterochromatin variations established in homozygous condition. Analysis of meiosis in the laboratory-generated F1 male hybrids from crosses (both ways) between M. terricolor I and II and between M. terricolor I and III shows high frequencies of pairing abnormalities at pachytene. The backcross (N3 generation) male hybrids between M. terricolor I and II have meiotic abnormalities as in the F1 male hybrids, though to a lesser extent. They show difference in pairing abnormalities in the different karyotypic forms; the backcross hybrids heterozygous for the heterochromatic short arms have more anomalies compared to the homokaryotypic hybrids. This suggests a negative influence of the heterochromatin heterozygosity in meiotic pairing. The results indicate a role for heterochromatin variations in the development of a reproductive barrier in the speciating M. terricolor complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711811     DOI: 10.1007/BF02706218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  37 in total

1.  AN AIR-DRYING METHOD FOR MEIOTIC PREPARATIONS FROM MAMMALIAN TESTES.

Authors:  E P EVANS; G BRECKON; C E FORD
Journal:  Cytogenetics       Date:  1964

Review 2.  Hybrid sterility in the mouse.

Authors:  J Forejt
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Direct evidence of a role for heterochromatin in meiotic chromosome segregation.

Authors:  A F Dernburg; J W Sedat; R S Hawley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  A human 9;20 reciprocal translocation associated with male infertility analyzed at prophase and metaphase I of meiosis.

Authors:  A C Chandley; R M Speed; S McBeath; T B Hargreave
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1986

Review 5.  Sex-chromosome pairing and male fertility.

Authors:  G L Miklos
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1974

Review 6.  The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis (Drosophila-allocycly-chromosome evolution-male sterility-dosage compensation).

Authors:  E Lifschytz; D L Lindsley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A reciprocal autosomal translocation which causes male sterility in the mouse also impairs oogenesis.

Authors:  P S Burgoyne; S Mahadevaiah; U Mittwoch
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1985-11

8.  Standard karyotype of the mouse, Mus musculus.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1972 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Electron microscopic investigations of synaptonemal complexes in an infertile human male carrier of a pericentric inversion inv(1)(p32q42). Regular loop formation but defective synapsis including a possible interchromosomal effect.

Authors:  J Batanian; M A Hulten
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Synaptonemal complex antigen location and conservation.

Authors:  P B Moens; C Heyting; A J Dietrich; W van Raamsdonk; Q Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  4 in total

1.  Analysis of close stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Doris Y Lui; Tamara L Peoples-Holst; Joshua Chang Mell; Hsin-Yen Wu; Eric W Dean; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The mitochondrial genome sequence of Mus terricolor: comparison with Mus musculus domesticus and implications for xenomitochondrial mouse modeling.

Authors:  Wendy K Pogozelski; Leah D Fletcher; Carolyn A Cassar; David A Dunn; Ian A Trounce; Carl A Pinkert
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Cytogenetic studies on populations of Camponotus rufipes (Fabricius, 1775) and Camponotus renggeri Emery, 1894 (Formicidae: Formicinae).

Authors:  Hilton Jeferson Alves Cardoso de Aguiar; Luísa Antônia Campos Barros; Danúbia Rodrigues Alves; Cléa Dos Santos Ferreira Mariano; Jacques Hubert Charles Delabie; Silvia das Graças Pompolo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Meiotic Nuclear Architecture in Distinct Mole Vole Hybrids with Robertsonian Translocations: Chromosome Chains, Stretched Centromeres, and Distorted Recombination.

Authors:  Sergey Matveevsky; Artemii Tretiakov; Anna Kashintsova; Irina Bakloushinskaya; Oxana Kolomiets
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.