Literature DB >> 12711583

Distractor interference in selective reaching: dissociating distance and grouping effects.

Ron F Keulen1, Jos J Adam, Martin H Fischer, Harm Kuipers, Jelle Jolles.   

Abstract

In the present experiment, the authors sought to differentiate between a distance and a grouping explanation for the symmetric versus asymmetric patterns of distractor interference in selective reaching. Participants (N = 16) pointed to a green target that appeared either with or without a red distractor. Target-distractor separation was manipulated within an array of 5 closely grouped stimulus boxes, and distractor interference (difference in performance between trials with and trials without a distractor) was measured in reaction time, movement time, percentage errors, and movement endpoints. Small distances (5 mm) between target and distractor yielded a symmetric pattern of interference, whereas large distances (20 mm) yielded an asymmetric pattern, with more interference from near than from far distractors. Those findings support the distance account of distractor interference and refute the grouping account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711583     DOI: 10.1080/00222890309602127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  2 in total

1.  Evidence inhibition responds reactively to the salience of distracting information during focused attention.

Authors:  Natalie Wyatt; Liana Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Affordance matching predictively shapes the perceptual representation of others' ongoing actions.

Authors:  Katrina L McDonough; Marcello Costantini; Matthew Hudson; Eleanor Ward; Patric Bach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.