Literature DB >> 12710874

Murine EMT-6 carcinoma: high therapeutic efficacy of microbeam radiation therapy.

F Avraham Dilmanian1, Gerard M Morris, Nan Zhong, Tigran Bacarian, James F Hainfeld, John Kalef-Ezra, Laura J Brewington, Jennifer Tammam, Eliot M Rosen.   

Abstract

Microbeam radiation therapy is an experimental modality using parallel arrays of thin (<100 micro m) slices of synchrotron-generated X rays (microplanar beams, microbeams). We used EMT-6 murine mammary carcinoma subcutaneously inoculated in the hind legs of mice to compare the therapeutic efficacies of single-fraction, unidirectional (1) "co-planar" microbeams (an array of vertically oriented microplanar beams), (2) "cross-planar" microbeams (two arrays of parallel microbeams propagated in the same direction, one with vertically and the other with horizontally oriented microplanar beams), and (3) seamless (broad) beams from the same synchrotron source. The microbeams were 90 micro m wide and were spaced 300 micro m on center; the median energy in all beams was 100 or 118 keV. Tumor ablation rates were 4/8, 4/8 and 6/7 for a 410-, 520- and 650-Gy in-slice cross-planar microbeam dose, respectively, and 1/8, 3/8, 3/7 and 6/8 for a 23-, 30-, 38- and 45-Gy broad-beam dose, respectively. When the data were pooled from the three highest doses (same average tumor ablations of 50-60%), the incidences of normal-tissue acute toxicity (moist desquamation and epilation) and delayed toxicity (failure of hair regrowth) were significantly lower for cross-planar microbeams than broad beams (P < 0.025). Furthermore, for the highest doses in these two groups, which also had the same tumor ablation rate (>75%), not only were the above toxicities lower for the cross-planar microbeams than for the broad beams (P < 0.02), but severe leg dysfunction was also lower (P < 0.003). These findings suggest that single-fraction microbeams can ablate tumors at high rates with relatively little normal-tissue toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12710874     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0632:mechte]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  25 in total

Review 1.  Microirradiation techniques in radiobiological research.

Authors:  Guido A Drexler; Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  X-ray microbeams: Tumor therapy and central nervous system research.

Authors:  F A Dilmanian; Y Qu; S Liu; C D Cool; J Gilbert; J F Hainfeld; C A Kruse; J Laterra; D Lenihan; M M Nawrocky; G Pappas; C-I Sze; T Yuasa; N Zhong; Z Zhong; J W McDonald
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 3.  Spatially fractionated proton minibeams.

Authors:  Juergen Meyer; John Eley; Thomas E Schmid; Stephanie E Combs; Remi Dendale; Yolanda Prezado
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Microbeam radiation therapy alters vascular architecture and tumor oxygenation and is enhanced by a galectin-1 targeted anti-angiogenic peptide.

Authors:  Robert J Griffin; Nathan A Koonce; Ruud P M Dings; Eric Siegel; Eduardo G Moros; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Peter M Corry
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Interlaced x-ray microplanar beams: a radiosurgery approach with clinical potential.

Authors:  F Avraham Dilmanian; Zhong Zhong; Tigran Bacarian; Helene Benveniste; Pantaleo Romanelli; Ruiliang Wang; Jeremy Welwart; Tetsuya Yuasa; Eliot M Rosen; David J Anschel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Synergy of gene-mediated immunoprophylaxis and microbeam radiation therapy for advanced intracerebral rat 9L gliosarcomas.

Authors:  H M Smilowitz; H Blattmann; E Bräuer-Krisch; A Bravin; M Di Michiel; J-O Gebbers; A L Hanson; N Lyubimova; D N Slatkin; J Stepanek; J A Laissue
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Biodosimetric quantification of short-term synchrotron microbeam versus broad-beam radiation damage to mouse skin using a dermatopathological scoring system.

Authors:  R C U Priyadarshika; J C Crosbie; B Kumar; P A W Rogers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Synchrotron radiation in cancer treatments and diagnostics: an overview.

Authors:  S Gil; M Fernández; Y Prezado; A Biete; A Bravin; M Sabés
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Image-guided microbeam irradiation to brain tumour bearing mice using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Hong Yuan; Laurel M Burk; Christy R Inscoe; Michael J Hadsell; Pavel Chtcheprov; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Physiologically gated microbeam radiation using a field emission x-ray source array.

Authors:  Pavel Chtcheprov; Laurel Burk; Hong Yuan; Christina Inscoe; Rachel Ger; Michael Hadsell; Jianping Lu; Lei Zhang; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.