Literature DB >> 12707869

Changes in bladder neck geometry and closure pressure after midurethral anchoring suggest a musculoelastic mechanism activates closure.

Peter Petros1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical origins and clinical significance of cough pressure transmission ratio (CTR) by using virtual-operation (VO) techniques.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients underwent perineal ultrasound examination, standard urethral pressure cough testing both with and without unilateral midurethral anchoring (VO), all tests being performed without urethral elevation. In eight patients where there was no change in CTR, a one-sided fold of suburethral vagina (VO) was taken (pinch test) and the CTR repeated.
RESULTS: After midurethral anchoring, maximal urethral pressure increased from a mean of 33.25 cm H2O to a mean of 58.06 cm H2O (P < 0.0001) and restoration of anatomy was noted in all 11 patients who had obvious funneling on straining. Conversion of a <100% CTR to >100% CTR in the proximal urethra was observed in 14 of 22 patients (P < 0.005), with no significant change noted in the distal urethra. Further conversion of CTR was noted in six of the remaining eight patients with unilateral plication of suburethral vagina (pinch test).
CONCLUSIONS: A musculoelastic closure mechanism most likely activates urethral closure. CTR is most likely an index of changed intraurethral area, not necessarily closure, and may be a more sensitive objective test than perineal ultrasound for diagnosing urethral narrowing, especially when used with virtual-operation techniques. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12707869     DOI: 10.1002/nau.10085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Integral Theory of continence.

Authors:  Peter E P Petros; Patrick J Woodman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-10-30

2.  Comment on Nager: the urethra is a reliable witness: simplifying the diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  F M E Wagenlehner; B Liedl; T Bschleipfer; P E Petros
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Urodynamics has a future: comment on editorial by Lose and Klarskov.

Authors:  P E P Petros
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Clinical and pathophysiological correlates of the symptom severity of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jenn-Ming Yang; Shwu-Huey Yang; Shu-Yu Yang; Evelyn Yang; Wen-Chen Huang; Chii-Ruey Tzeng
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Overactive bladder (OAB): a failed concept needing revision to accommodate an external anatomical control system.

Authors:  Peter Petros; Jörgen Quaghebeur; Jean-Jacques Wyndaele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Restoration of continence by pessaries: magnetic resonance imaging assessment of mechanism of action.

Authors:  Yuko M Komesu; Loren H Ketai; Rebecca G Rogers; Steven C Eberhardt; Jennifer Pohl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Pelvic organ prolapse and the lower urinary tract: the relationship of vaginal prolapse to stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Phillip P Smith; Rodney A Appell
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.862

8.  The urethral hanging theory and how it relates to Enhörning's theory and the integral theory.

Authors:  Bo S Bergström
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Urethral closure occurs by recoiling, pressure transmission, and a guarding reflex.

Authors:  Bo S Bergström
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Stress urinary incontinence is caused predominantly by urethral support failure.

Authors:  Bo S Bergström
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 1.932

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.