Literature DB >> 12707788

[Epidemiology of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the general population of Germany: results of an echocardiographic study of a large population-based sample].

M Fischer1, A Baessler, S R Holmer, M Muscholl, U Bröckel, A Luchner, H-W Hense, A Döring, G Riegger, H Schunkert.   

Abstract

The prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in the general population is poorly defined. Specifically, the number of asymptomatic individuals with LVSD and, thus, the most appropriate strategy to identify and treat such subjects is still unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to document LV dysfunction in a middle-aged (25 to 75 years, mean 51.8+/-13.8) population - based sample in Germany (MONICA Augsburg, n=1678; echocardiography technically adequate n=1418) by M-mode and 2D-echocardiography and to analyze the importance of predisposing contributors. The overall prevalence of an ejection fraction (EF) less than 48% (mean minus 2 SD=LVSD) was 2.3% (n=33), with a slightly higher rate in men than in women (2.8% vs 1.9%, n.s.). LVSD rate increased with age: from 1.5% in individuals younger than 40 years to 4.0% among those older than 60 years of age (p<0.05). Of 33 participants with reduced left ventricular systolic function, 20 presented with at least one cardiovascular disease. The most frequent diagnoses were arterial hypertension, obesity and coronary heart disease. Only 13 subjects (0.9%) of the study population were asymptomatic without a history of cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, only 6 subjects (0.4%, 4 male) in this population presented with a moderate impairment of LV function (EF of 30 to 40%) and only 1 subject (0.07%, male) had severe LVSD (EF less than 30%). Almost all subjects with an EF less than 40% (6 of 7 individuals) had a known history of cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, LVSD is a relatively common finding in the general population. However, severe LVSD is rare in subjects without any concomitant cardiovascular disease. Thus, echocardiographic screening cannot be recommended in the unselected, middle-aged population to identify such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12707788     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-003-0899-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN: 0300-5860


  5 in total

1.  [Telemonitoring in chronic heart failure patients. Which diagnostic finding prevents hospital readmission?].

Authors:  C Zugck; M Nelles; L Frankenstein; C Schultz; T Helms; H Korb; H A Katus; A Remppis
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2005-09

2.  [Is standard-echocardiography sufficient for identification of responders?].

Authors:  M Neuss; P Flach; T Ali; C Butter
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2006

3.  [Obesity and heart failure].

Authors:  S Frantz; M Fassnacht; B Allolio; J Bauersachs
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Wave intensity of aortic root pressure as diagnostic marker of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernhard Hametner; Stephanie Parragh; Thomas Weber; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Rationale, design and conduct of a randomised controlled trial evaluating a primary care-based complex intervention to improve the quality of life of heart failure patients: HICMan (Heidelberg Integrated Case Management).

Authors:  Frank Peters-Klimm; Thomas Müller-Tasch; Dieter Schellberg; Jochen Gensichen; Christiane Muth; Wolfgang Herzog; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.