BACKGROUND: Motor sequence learning is abnormal in PD. However, it is not known whether this defect is present during the earliest stages of the illness or whether it reflects specific limitations in dividing attention between cognitive and motor requirements. METHODS: Fifteen patients with early stage PD and 10 age-matched and 9 younger normal controls moved the right dominant hand on a digitizing tablet to eight targets presented on a screen in synchrony with a tone at 1-second intervals. The tasks were as follows: 1) CCW--a timed-response task where targets appeared in a predictable counterclockwise order; 2) RAN--a reaction time task where targets were random and unpredictable; 3) SEQ--a task with multiple demands emphasizing explicit learning and target anticipation in which subjects learned a sequence while reaching for targets; and 4) VSEQ--subjects learned a visual sequence without moving. RESULTS: CCW and RAN yielded similar results in all groups. In patients with PD, sequence learning was the same in SEQ and VSEQ and was slower compared to both control groups. In older controls, learning was faster in VSEQ than in SEQ, whereas younger controls learned equally fast in both tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Despite normal motor execution, the initial phases of sequence learning are impaired in early PD independent of task requirements, possibly reflecting reduced working memory. Learning was slower in older than younger controls only in tasks with multiple demands, presumably due to reduced attentional resources.
BACKGROUND: Motor sequence learning is abnormal in PD. However, it is not known whether this defect is present during the earliest stages of the illness or whether it reflects specific limitations in dividing attention between cognitive and motor requirements. METHODS: Fifteen patients with early stage PD and 10 age-matched and 9 younger normal controls moved the right dominant hand on a digitizing tablet to eight targets presented on a screen in synchrony with a tone at 1-second intervals. The tasks were as follows: 1) CCW--a timed-response task where targets appeared in a predictable counterclockwise order; 2) RAN--a reaction time task where targets were random and unpredictable; 3) SEQ--a task with multiple demands emphasizing explicit learning and target anticipation in which subjects learned a sequence while reaching for targets; and 4) VSEQ--subjects learned a visual sequence without moving. RESULTS:CCW and RAN yielded similar results in all groups. In patients with PD, sequence learning was the same in SEQ and VSEQ and was slower compared to both control groups. In older controls, learning was faster in VSEQ than in SEQ, whereas younger controls learned equally fast in both tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Despite normal motor execution, the initial phases of sequence learning are impaired in early PD independent of task requirements, possibly reflecting reduced working memory. Learning was slower in older than younger controls only in tasks with multiple demands, presumably due to reduced attentional resources.
Authors: Jeff A Beeler; Zhen Fang Huang Cao; Mazen A Kheirbek; Yunmin Ding; Jessica Koranda; Mari Murakami; Un Jung Kang; Xiaoxi Zhuang Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Bernardo Perfetti; Clara Moisello; Eric C Landsness; Svetlana Kvint; April Pruski; Marco Onofrj; Giulio Tononi; M Felice Ghilardi Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: B Perfetti; C Moisello; S Lanzafame; S Varanese; E C Landsness; M Onofrj; A Di Rocco; G Tononi; M F Ghilardi Journal: Arch Ital Biol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: M Felice Ghilardi; Clara Moisello; Giulia Silvestri; Claude Ghez; John W Krakauer Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Lucio Marinelli; Angelo Quartarone; Mark Hallett; Giuseppe Frazzitta; Maria Felice Ghilardi Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-04-09 Impact factor: 3.708