Literature DB >> 12706519

The Munich Vulnerability Study on Affective Disorders: risk factors for unipolarity versus bipolarity.

Sieglinde Modell1, Johannes Huber, Florian Holsboer, Christoph J Lauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An individual with a high genetic load for psychiatric disorders is subject to a considerable risk factor for an affective illness. Family studies usually try to distinguish between bipolar and unipolar disorders since it was suggested that they might show different modes of inheritance. The aim of this study was to differentiate between healthy members of unipolar and bipolar families without a previous history of any psychiatric disorder according to the neurobiological and psychometric findings.
METHODS: We first analysed the results obtained from neurobiological and psychometric measurements taken from 75 healthy subjects who had at least two close relatives with a unipolar and a bipolar disorder. In a second step we examined the subjects with a parental affective disorder; finally, we compared the members of 'pure' unipolar, bipolar and of mixed families to each other.
RESULTS: The first-degree relatives of unipolar patients showed a significantly higher REM density and scored higher on scales of 'neuroticism' and 'vegetative lability' than the controls. No significant differences could be noticed between the relatives of unipolar and bipolar patients, either when considering the degree of relationship, or the parental type of affective disorder and the 'purity' of the respective families.
CONCLUSIONS: We found some distinct neurobiological and psychometric differences between the relatives of unipolar patients and the control probands. No obvious differences, however, were ascertained between relatives of unipolar and bipolar patients. Therefore, we consider it to be possible that these findings represent potential vulnerability markers for affective disorders in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12706519     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00010-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of target genes regulated by chronic electroconvulsive therapy reveals role for Fzd6 in depression.

Authors:  Bhavya Voleti; Keith Q Tanis; Samuel S Newton; Ronald S Duman
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Clinical relevance of disturbances of sleep and vigilance in major depressive disorder: a review.

Authors:  Michael E Thase; Harald Murck; Anke Post
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep: an endophenotype for depression.

Authors:  Sieglinde Modell; Christoph J Lauer
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Neural Correlates of Three Promising Endophenotypes of Depression: Evidence from the EMBARC Study.

Authors:  Christian A Webb; Daniel G Dillon; Pia Pechtel; Franziska K Goer; Laura Murray; Quentin J M Huys; Maurizio Fava; Patrick J McGrath; Myrna Weissman; Ramin Parsey; Benji T Kurian; Phillip Adams; Sarah Weyandt; Joseph M Trombello; Bruce Grannemann; Crystal M Cooper; Patricia Deldin; Craig Tenke; Madhukar Trivedi; Gerard Bruder; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Sleep architecture as correlate and predictor of symptoms and impairment in inter-episode bipolar disorder: taking on the challenge of medication effects.

Authors:  Polina Eidelman; Lisa S Talbot; June Gruber; Ilana Hairston; Allison G Harvey
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 6.  A review of selected candidate endophenotypes for depression.

Authors:  Brandon L Goldstein; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-19

7.  Depression Risk Is Associated With Weakened Synchrony Between the Amygdala and Experienced Emotion.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; Myrna M Weissman; Zhishun Wang; Virginia Warner; Marc J Gameroff; David P Semanek; Xuejun Hao; Jay A Gingrich; Bradley S Peterson; Jonathan Posner; Ardesheer Talati
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-11-02

8.  Unipolar versus bipolar disorder: a distinction not helpful for studies of causality.

Authors:  Florian Holsboer
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.081

Review 9.  Bipolar disorder--methodological problems and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jules Angst
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.986

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.