Literature DB >> 12704616

From single-race reporting to multiple-race reporting: using imputation methods to bridge the transition.

Nathaniel Schenker1, Jennifer D Parker.   

Abstract

In 1997, the Office of Management and Budget issued revised standards for the collection of race information within the Federal statistical system. One revision allows individuals to choose more than one race group when responding to Federal surveys and other Federal data collections. This paper explores methods that impute single-race categories for those who have given multiple-race responses. Such imputations would be useful when it is desired to conduct analyses involving only single-race categories, such as when trends over time are being examined by race group so that data collected under the old and new standards are being combined. The National Health Interview Survey has allowed multiple-race responses for several years, while also asking respondents to specify one race as their primary race. Exploratory analyses of data from the survey suggest that imputation methods that use demographic and contextual covariate information to predict primary race can have advantages with respect to lower bias and improved variance estimation compared to simpler methods discussed by the Office of Management and Budget. It also appears, however, that the relationships between primary race and covariates might be changing over time. Thus, caution should be exercised if an imputation model fitted to data from one time period is to be applied to data from another time period. Published in 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12704616     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  19 in total

1.  Mind the gap: bridge methods to allocate multiple-race mothers in trend analyses of birth certificate data.

Authors:  Katherine E Heck; Jennifer D Parker; C Jane McKendry; Gilberto F Chávez
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-03

2.  Bridging between two standards for collecting information on race and ethnicity: an application to Census 2000 and vital rates.

Authors:  Jennifer D Parker; Nathaniel Schenker; Deborah D Ingram; James A Weed; Katherine E Heck; Jennifer H Madans
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Geographic variation in trends and characteristics of teen childbearing among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1990-2007.

Authors:  Phyllis A Wingo; Catherine A Lesesne; Ruben A Smith; Lori de Ravello; David K Espey; Teshia G Arambula Solomon; Myra Tucker; Judith Thierry
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-12

4.  Is there progress toward eliminating racial/ethnic disparities in the leading causes of death?

Authors:  Kenneth G Keppel; Jeffrey N Pearcy; Melonie P Heron
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  The role of reported primary race on health measures for multiple race respondents in the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer D Parker
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Use of multiple imputation to correct for bias in lung cancer incidence trends by histologic subtype.

Authors:  Mandi Yu; Eric J Feuer; Kathleen A Cronin; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A practical approach to using multiple-race response data: a bridging method for public-use microdata.

Authors:  Carolyn A Liebler; Andrew Halpern-Manners
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-02

8.  Impact of depression on the intensity of patient navigation for women with abnormal cancer screenings.

Authors:  Ignacio I De La Cruz; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia; Clara A Chen; Sharon Bak; Richard Kalish; Barbara Lottero; Patrick Egan; Tim Heeren; Andrea C Kronman
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-02

9.  The impact of insurance coverage during insurance reform on diagnostic resolution of cancer screening abnormalities.

Authors:  Alok Kapoor; Tracy A Battaglia; Alexis P Isabelle; Amresh D Hanchate; Richard L Kalish; Sharon Bak; Rebecca G Mishuris; Swati M Shroff; Karen M Freund
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-02

10.  Combining information from two data sources with misreporting and incompleteness to assess hospice-use among cancer patients: a multiple imputation approach.

Authors:  Yulei He; Mary Beth Landrum; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.