Literature DB >> 12704306

Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial.

Deed E Harrison1, Donald D Harrison, Joeseph J Betz, Tadeusz J Janik, Burt Holland, Christopher J Colloca, Jason W Haas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical lordosis has been shown to be an important outcome of care; however, few conservative methods of rehabilitating sagittal cervical alignment have been reported.
OBJECTIVE: To study whether a seated, retracted, extended, and compressed position would cause tension in the anterior cervical ligament, anterior disk, and muscle structures, and thereby restore cervical lordosis or increase the curvature in patients with loss of the cervical lordosis. STUDY
DESIGN: Nonrandomized, prospective, clinical control trial.
METHODS: Thirty preselected patients, after diagnostic screening for tolerance to cervical extension with compression, were treated for the first 3 weeks of care using cervical manipulation and a new type of cervical extension-compression traction (vertical weight applied to the subject's forehead in the sitting position with a transverse load at the area of kyphosis). Pretreatment and posttreatment Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain ratings were compared along with pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cervical radiographs analyzed with the posterior tangent method for changes in alignment. Results are compared to a control group of 33 subjects receiving no treatment and matched for age, sex, weight, height, and pain.
RESULTS: Control subjects reported no change in VAS pain ratings and had no statistical significant change in segmental or global cervical alignment on comparative lateral cervical radiographs (difference in all angle mean values < 1.3 degrees ) repeated an average of 8.5 months later. For the traction group, VAS ratings were 4.1 pretreatment and 1.1 posttreatment. On comparative lateral cervical radiographs repeated after an average of 38 visits over 14.6 weeks, 10 angles and 2 distances showed statistically significant improvements, including anterior head weight bearing (mean improvement of 11 mm), Cobb angle at C2-C7 (mean improvement of -13.6 degrees ), and the angle of intersection of the posterior tangents at C2-C7 (mean improvement of 17.9 degrees ). Twenty-one (70%) of the treatment group subjects were followed for an additional 14 months; improvements in cervical lordosis and anterior weight bearing were maintained.
CONCLUSIONS: Chiropractic biophysics (CBP) technique's extension-compression 2-way cervical traction combined with spinal manipulation decreased chronic neck pain intensity and improved cervical lordosis in 38 visits over 14.6 weeks, as indicated by increases in segmental and global cervical alignment. Anterior head weight-bearing was reduced by 11 mm; Cobb angles averaged an increase of 13 degrees to 14 degrees; and the angle of intersection of posterior tangents on C2 and C7 averaged 17.9 degrees of improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12704306     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-4754(02)54106-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  37 in total

1.  Current issues with standards in the measurement and documentation of human skeletal anatomy.

Authors:  Justin Magee; Brian McClelland; John Winder
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Use of fallacious arguments, Ad Hominem attacks, and biased 'expert opinions' can make CBP research 'appear flawed'.

Authors:  Deed E Harrison; Donald D Harrison; Paul A Oakley; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

3.  Flawed trials, flawed analysis: why CBP should avoid rating itself.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Stephen M Perle; Brian J Gleberzon; David H Peterson
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-06

4.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

5.  Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

6.  Effect of Biofeedback Corrective Exercise on Reaction Time and Central Somatosensory Conduction Time in Patients With Forward Head Posture and Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ayman A Mohamed; Yih-Kuen Jan; Neveen Abdel Raoof; Omaima Kattabei; Ibrahim Moustafa; Hanan Hosny
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-03-16

7.  Chiropractic clinical practice guideline: evidence-based treatment of adult neck pain not due to whiplash.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anderson-Peacock; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Roland Bryans; Normand Danis; Andrea Furlan; Henri Marcoux; Brock Potter; Rick Ruegg; Janice Gross Stein; Eleanor White
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-09

Review 8.  Correction of Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis Following a Non-Surgical Structural Spinal Rehabilitation Protocol Using Lumbar Traction: A Case Study and Selective Review of Literature.

Authors:  Curtis Fedorchuk; Douglas F Lightstone; Christi McRae; Derek Kaczor
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-31

9.  The effects of cervical joint manipulation, based on passive motion analysis, on cervical lordosis, forward head posture, and cervical ROM in university students with abnormal posture of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Wontae Gong
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26

10.  Does cervical lordosis change after spinal manipulation for non-specific neck pain? A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael Shilton; Jonathan Branney; Bas Penning de Vries; Alan C Breen
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2015-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.