Literature DB >> 12702960

Barrett esophagus: endoscopic findings and what to biopsy.

H Worth Boyce1.   

Abstract

Barrett esophagus (BE) is considered the precursor for nearly all cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The potential sequence from intestinal metaplasia to dysplasia to cancer can best be monitored by careful endoscopic observation and surveillance biopsies. The ability to diagnose BE, biopsy accurately, and appropriately monitor are requisites for all who care for patients with this disorder. The normal endoscopic anatomy of the esophagogastric junction region and the changes that are associated with BE are discussed. The relationship of the squamocolumnar mucosal junction to the proximal margin of the gastric folds and the distal extent of the linear esophageal vessels is the principal landmark for diagnosis. Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue and Lugol iodine will enhance endoscopic observation, thereby allowing directed biopsies. Biopsy forceps and technique are reviewed along with the when and where for surveillance biopsies. Since most dysplasia and intramucosal cancer is focal and invisible to the endoscopist, it is easy to understand why the sampling error exceeds 95% using a standard four-quadrant biopsy protocol. Currently, this sampling error can be reduced by four-quadrant biopsies at closer intervals and biopsies of even the most minor focal abnormalities of mucosa in the BE segment. Screening may be enhanced in the future depending upon successful development of new cytologic, spectrographic, and tomographic methods capable of identifying foci of dysplasia or cancer that can be confirmed by targeted biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12702960     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200305001-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  6 in total

1.  Histopathology of columnar-lined esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Johannes Lenglinger; Claudia Ringhofer; Margit Eisler; Roland Sedivy; Fritz Wrba; Johannes Zacherl; Enrico P Cosentini; Gerhard Prager; Michael Haefner; Martin Riegler
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Videoendoscopy and histopathology of the esophagogastric junction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Claudia Ringhofer; Johannes Lenglinger; Margit Eisler; Fritz Wrba; Roland Sedivy; Johannes Zacherl; Enrico P Cosentini; Gerhard Prager; Elena Devyatko; Martin Riegler
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Computer-assisted analysis of abrasive transepithelial brush biopsies increases the effectiveness of esophageal screening: a multicenter prospective clinical trial by the EndoCDx Collaborative Group.

Authors:  J F Johanson; J Frakes; D Eisen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Lymphatic vessel density in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's oesophagus to adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M-A Brundler; J A Harrison; B de Saussure; M de Perrot; M S Pepper
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  A microRNA Signature Identifies Patients at Risk of Barrett Esophagus Progression to Dysplasia and Cancer.

Authors:  James Saller; Kun Jiang; Yin Xiong; Sean J Yoder; Kevin Neill; Jose M Pimiento; Luis Pena; F Scott Corbett; Anthony Magliocco; Domenico Coppola
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The utility of cytokeratins 7 and 20 (CK7/20) immunohistochemistry in the distinction of short-segment Barrett esophagus from gastric intestinal metaplasia: Is it reliable?

Authors:  Ozlem Kurtkaya-Yapicier; Rasim Gencosmanoglu; Erol Avsar; Nadi Bakirci; Nurdan Tozun; Aydin Sav
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.