Literature DB >> 12701954

EU and member state medical devices regulation.

Christa Altenstetter1.   

Abstract

This article examines European Union (EU) and member state regulation of medical devices, particularly: a) the similarities and differences between medical devices and prescription drugs, including the respective industries, market authorization pathways, and boundary issues between the two sectors; b) the political background, current nature, and future prospects for EU medical device regulation; and c) regulatory responsibilities of the member states. Included are definitions of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics, and a brief history of their treatment by European law. The erosion of boundaries between exclusive and shared responsibilities of the EU and member states will be addressed, especially as it affects market approval of medical devices, clinical investigations, labeling and instructions for use, price setting and reimbursement, and evidence-based medicine and healthcare technology assessment. Finally, the article discusses medical device reporting and surveillance systems, which may be the weakest link in the EU integrative process. If patient safety is as important to the EU regulatory scheme as free movement and competitiveness, then both Brussels and member states will require additional resources, as well as measures to overcome obstacles to implementation, evaluation, and accountability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12701954     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462303000217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  6 in total

1.  Regulating medicines in Croatia: five-year experience of Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices.

Authors:  Sinisa Tomić; Anita Filipović Sucić; Ana Plazonić; Rajka Truban Zulj; Viola Macolić Sarinić; Branka Cudina; Adrijana Ilić Martinac
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edmund A M Neugebauer; Monika Becker; Gerhard F Buess; Alfred Cuschieri; Hans-Peter Dauben; Abe Fingerhut; Karl H Fuchs; Brigitte Habermalz; Leonid Lantsberg; Mario Morino; Stella Reiter-Theil; Gabriela Soskuty; Wolfgang Wayand; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Are Regulations Safe? Reflections From Developing a Digital Cancer Decision-Support Tool.

Authors:  Ciarán D McInerney; Beverly C Scott; Owen A Johnson
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-03

5.  Precaution, governance and the failure of medical implants: the ASR((TM)) hip in the UK.

Authors:  Matthias Wienroth; Pauline McCormack; Thomas J Joyce
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  Drugs and Devices: Comparison of European and U.S. Approval Processes.

Authors:  Gail A Van Norman
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2016-08-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.