BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Glutaraldehyde (GA)-fixed aortic valves used in heart valve replacement surgery have limited durability due to tissue degeneration and calcification. Despite their structural and functional importance, very little is known about the fate of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) within the extracellular matrix of bioprosthetic heart valves. The study aim was to investigate the stability of GAGs in GA-fixed tissues and to identify enzymatic mechanisms that may be responsible for GAG degeneration. METHODS: Porcine aortic valve cusps were fixed with GA and implanted subdermally in rats for 21 days. Fresh, fixed and explanted cusps were analyzed for GAG content by hexosamine determination, and GAG-degrading enzyme activity was evaluated using zymography. GAG classes in fresh cusps were also assessed by flurorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis. Fresh and GA-fixed cusps were also exposed in vitro to hyaluronidase and chondroitinase in order to test the susceptibility of cusp GAGs towards enzymatic degradation. RESULTS: Native aortic cusps contained -3.5% GAGs by dry weight, consisting of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate. Significantly lower GAG levels were found in aortic cusps after fixation with GA, and even lower levels were found after subdermal implantation in rats. GAG levels in GA-fixed cusps were also significantly reduced by in-vitro incubation with hyaluronidase and chondroitinase. Novel GAG-degrading enzymes were detected in considerable levels in native cusps, in lower levels in GA-fixed cusps and significantly increased levels after subdermal implantation of GA-fixed cusps. CONCLUSION: The combined action of active GAG-degrading enzymes and the failure of GA to stabilize GAGs towards enzymatic digestion may contribute significantly to bioprosthetic heart valve degeneration and subsequent structural failure.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Glutaraldehyde (GA)-fixed aortic valves used in heart valve replacement surgery have limited durability due to tissue degeneration and calcification. Despite their structural and functional importance, very little is known about the fate of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) within the extracellular matrix of bioprosthetic heart valves. The study aim was to investigate the stability of GAGs in GA-fixed tissues and to identify enzymatic mechanisms that may be responsible for GAGdegeneration. METHODS: Porcine aortic valve cusps were fixed with GA and implanted subdermally in rats for 21 days. Fresh, fixed and explanted cusps were analyzed for GAG content by hexosamine determination, and GAG-degrading enzyme activity was evaluated using zymography. GAG classes in fresh cusps were also assessed by flurorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis. Fresh and GA-fixed cusps were also exposed in vitro to hyaluronidase and chondroitinase in order to test the susceptibility of cusp GAGs towards enzymatic degradation. RESULTS: Native aortic cusps contained -3.5% GAGs by dry weight, consisting of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate. Significantly lower GAG levels were found in aortic cusps after fixation with GA, and even lower levels were found after subdermal implantation in rats. GAG levels in GA-fixed cusps were also significantly reduced by in-vitro incubation with hyaluronidase and chondroitinase. Novel GAG-degrading enzymes were detected in considerable levels in native cusps, in lower levels in GA-fixed cusps and significantly increased levels after subdermal implantation of GA-fixed cusps. CONCLUSION: The combined action of active GAG-degrading enzymes and the failure of GA to stabilize GAGs towards enzymatic digestion may contribute significantly to bioprosthetic heart valve degeneration and subsequent structural failure.
Authors: Leslie Neil Sierad; Eliza Laine Shaw; Alexander Bina; Bryn Brazile; Nicholas Rierson; Sourav S Patnaik; Allison Kennamer; Rebekah Odum; Ovidiu Cotoi; Preda Terezia; Klara Branzaniuc; Harrison Smallwood; Radu Deac; Imre Egyed; Zoltan Pavai; Annamaria Szanto; Lucian Harceaga; Horatiu Suciu; Victor Raicea; Peter Olah; Agneta Simionescu; Jun Liao; Ionela Movileanu; Marius Harpa; Dan Teodor Simionescu Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Joshua J Lovekamp; Dan T Simionescu; Jeremy J Mercuri; Brett Zubiate; Michael S Sacks; Narendra R Vyavahare Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2005-09-06 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Chad E Eckert; Rong Fan; Brandon Mikulis; Mathew Barron; Christopher A Carruthers; Vincent M Friebe; Naren R Vyavahare; Michael S Sacks Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Mary E Tedder; Jun Liao; Benjamin Weed; Christopher Stabler; Henry Zhang; Agneta Simionescu; Dan T Simionescu Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Daniel S Puperi; Ronan W O'Connell; Zoe E Punske; Yan Wu; Jennifer L West; K Jane Grande-Allen Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 6.988