| Literature DB >> 12701753 |
Arjan J Bosman1, Myrthe K S Hol, Ad F M Snik, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Cor W R J Cremers.
Abstract
In nine patients with unilateral deafness and normal hearing in the contralateral ear, measurements of sound localization and speech perception were obtained before intervention, with a conventional contralateral routing of sound (CROS) hearing aid and later with a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implanted in the deaf ear. Sound localization did not show any differences between the three conditions. Speech perception using short, everyday sentences showed a reduction in the head-shadow effect of 2 dB for both the conventional CROS hearing aid and the BAHA in comparison to the unaided condition. Patients' real-life experiences of the three conditions were evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. The results showed a significant benefit with the BAHA in situations involving background noise and reverberation and a reduced aversion to loud sounds in comparison to the unaided and conventional CROS conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12701753 DOI: 10.1080/000164580310001105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Otolaryngol ISSN: 0001-6489 Impact factor: 1.494