Literature DB >> 12701000

[Assessment and implementation of guidelines].

H Kirchner1, M Fiene, G Ollenschläger.   

Abstract

The importance of guidelines increases continuously on the political level whereas on the user level reservations and uncertainty persist. Consequently guidelines are not considered as they should be. Guidelines will develop their effectiveness only if they are firmly implemented in the delivery process. Acceptance problems spring from problems in development and from aspects of dissemination and implementation not sufficiently considered so far. Therefore a lot of countries have developed quality criteria for guidelines and programmes for quality promotion. To further the use of guidelines in the care process aspects of dissemination and implementation have to be recognized even in the development process. This has not been recognized sufficiently so far. Implementation of guidelines is a systematic approach which has to be connected seamlessly with other activities (e. g. quality management). The implementation process should be accompanied and evaluated so that a continuous adjustment is possible. Most of the existing guideline programmes do not consider this sufficiently. The following contribution gives a survey of results and introduces means and instruments for assessment and implementation of guidelines.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12701000     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)        ISSN: 0034-3536            Impact factor:   1.113


  3 in total

1.  [Implementation of the S3 prostate cancer guideline in daily clinical practice: results of a survey among urologists].

Authors:  M Fröhner; C Khan; R Koch; S G Schorr; M Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Physicians' Perspectives on the Implementation of the Second Opinion Directive in Germany-An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Susann May; Dunja Bruch; Felix Muehlensiepen; Yuriy Ignatyev; Edmund Neugebauer; Cecile Ronckers; Sebastian von Peter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  COVID-19 Intensive Care-Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany.

Authors:  Anne Werner; Maria Popp; Falk Fichtner; Christopher Holzmann-Littig; Peter Kranke; Anke Steckelberg; Julia Lühnen; Lisa Marie Redlich; Steffen Dickel; Clemens Grimm; Onnen Moerer; Monika Nothacker; Christian Seeber
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.