Literature DB >> 12700563

Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery.

Craig A Cummins1, George A C Murrell.   

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. After surgical repair, there is a significant re-tear rate (25%-90%). The aim of this study was to determine the primary mode of mechanical failure for rotator cuffs repaired with suture anchors at the time of revision rotator cuff repair. We prospectively followed 342 consecutive torn rotator cuffs, repaired by a single surgeon using suture anchors and a mattress-suturing configuration. Of those shoulders, 21 (6%) subsequently underwent a revision rotator cuff repair by the original surgeon, and 1 underwent a second revision repair. Intraoperative findings, including the mode of failure, were systematically recorded at revision surgery and compared with the findings at the primary repair. In addition, 81 primary rotator cuff repairs had a radiographic and fluoroscopic evaluation at a mean of 37 weeks after repair to assess for any loosening or migration of the anchors. At revision rotator cuff repair, the predominant mode of failure was tendon pulling through sutures (19/22 shoulders) (P <.001). Two recurrent tears occurred in a new location adjacent to the previous repair, and one anchor was found loose in the supraspinatus tendon. The mean size of the rotator cuff tear was larger at the revision surgery (P =.043), the tendon quality ranked poorer (P =.013), and the tendon mobility decreased (P =.002), as compared with the index procedure. The radiographs and fluoroscopic examination showed that all 335 anchors in 81 patients were in bone. Rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors that underwent revision surgery failed mechanically by three mechanisms, the most common of which was tendon pulling through sutures. This suggests that the weak link in rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors and horizontal mattress sutures, as determined at revision surgery, is the tendon-suture interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12700563     DOI: 10.1067/mse.2003.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  75 in total

1.  Tenocyte proliferation on collagen scaffolds protects against degradation and improves scaffold properties.

Authors:  J M R Tilley; S Chaudhury; O Hakimi; A J Carr; J T Czernuszka
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Stitch positioning influences the suture hold in supraspinatus tendon repair.

Authors:  Karl Wieser; Stefan Rahm; Mazda Farshad; Eugene T Ek; Christian Gerber; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Tendon-grasping strength of various suture configurations for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Onur Hapa; F Alan Barber; Emin Sünbüloğlu; Yavuz Kocabey; Nazlı Sarkalkan; Gökhan Baysal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Primary stability of rotator cuff repair: can more suture materials yield more strength?

Authors:  Mehmet Gülecyüz; Hannes Bortolotti; Matthias Pietschmann; Andreas Ficklscherer; Thomas Niethammer; Björn Roßbach; Peter Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Rotator cuff repair: single- vs double-row. Clinical and biomechanical results].

Authors:  M H Baums; T Kostuj; H-M Klinger; R Papalia
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Adhesive-based tendon-to-bone repair: failure modelling and materials selection.

Authors:  Evangelos I Avgoulas; Michael P F Sutcliffe; Stephen W Linderman; Victor Birman; Stavros Thomopoulos; Guy M Genin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  The acromial index is not predictive for failed rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Patricio Melean; Sven Lichtenberg; Fredy Montoya; Stephan Riedmann; Petra Magosch; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Synthetic and degradable patches: an emerging solution for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Osnat Hakimi; Pierre-Alexis Mouthuy; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review.

Authors:  P Randelli; P Spennacchio; V Ragone; P Arrigoni; A Casella; P Cabitza
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

10.  Open versus two forms of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Neal L Millar; Xiao Wu; Robyn Tantau; Elizabeth Silverstone; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.