Literature DB >> 12699804

Prediction of intrauterine growth restriction with customised estimated fetal weight centiles.

Philip Owen1, Jo Ogah, Lucas M Bachmann, Khalid S Khan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1. To determine the value of third trimester customized estimated fetal weight centile ranking in the prediction of infants born with anthropometric features of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). 2. To compare the performance of customized centiles with fetal growth velocity in the prediction of IUGR.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: Department of Obstetric Ultrasound. POPULATION: Two hundred and seventy-four women with low risk pregnancies who were participants in a previously published longitudinal study of fetal biometry.
METHODS: Third trimester estimated fetal weight customized centiles were obtained after adjustment for gestational age at the time of ultrasound, birth order and gender, maternal weight, height and ethnic origin. Fetal growth velocity was calculated using the increment in the fetal abdominal area over a mean 28-day interval. Fetal abdominal area growth velocity was expressed as a standard deviation (Z score). Three neonatal anthropometric measures were used to define IUGR: subscapular or triceps skinfold thickness <10th centile, ponderal index <25th centile, mid-arm circumference to occipito-frontal circumference <-1 SD. The ability of estimated fetal weight customized centiles <5th centile and <10th centile to identify growth restriction was determined by calculating likelihood ratios. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Likelihood ratios for the prediction of neonatal anthropometric features of IUGR.
RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight infants had an estimated fetal weight customized centile calculated and one or more anthropometric measurements. The mean customized estimated fetal weight centile for cases with and without a low skinfold thickness were 16.4 vs 41.7 (P < 0.01); the mean values of customized estimated fetal weight centile for cases with and without ponderal index <25th centile were 22.8 vs 42.7 (P < 0.01); mean estimated fetal weight customized centiles for cases with and without mid-arm circumference to occipito-frontal circumference <-1 SD were 26.3 vs 40.5 (P > 0.05). A customized estimated fetal weight centile of 5 or less had likelihood ratios (95% CI) of 4.9 (2.7-6.3), 6.8 (4.5-10.6) and 6.3 (3.7-14) for skinfold thickness <10th centile, ponderal index <25th centile and mid-arm circumference to occipito-frontal circumference <-1 SD, respectively. An estimated fetal weight customized centile of 10 or less had likelihood ratios of 4.5 (2.6-8.6), 4.1 (2.5-7.2) and 7.1 (3.5-24) for skinfold thickness <10th centile, ponderal index <25th centile and mid-arm circumference to occipito-frontal circumference <-1 SD, respectively. In the prediction of a ponderal index <25th centile, the fetal abdominal area velocity likelihood ratio for a positive test is higher than the likelihood ratio for the 10th estimated fetal weight customized centile (P = 0.04) but is not significantly higher for the other outcomes. The fetal abdominal area velocity likelihood ratio is not significantly higher than the likelihood ratios for the fifth estimated fetal weight customized centile for any of the three outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Customized estimated fetal weight centiles in the late third trimester are moderately useful in the identification of infants with IUGR but are less accurate than calculated growth velocity in the prediction of an infant with a low ponderal index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  5 in total

Review 1.  Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Lami Yeo; Offer Erez; Uma Ramamurthy; Medha Naik; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

3.  Fetal ischemia monitoring with in vivo implanted electrochemical multiparametric microsensors.

Authors:  Samuel Dulay; Lourdes Rivas; Mònica Mir; Josep Samitier; Laura Pla; Sergio Berdún; Elisenda Eixarch; Eduard Gratacós; Miriam Illa
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Customized versus Population Growth Standards for Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification Using Ultrasonographic Fetal Growth Assessment at 22 to 29 Weeks' Gestation.

Authors:  Nathan R Blue; William A Grobman; Jacob C Larkin; Christina M Scifres; Hyagriv N Simhan; Judith H Chung; George R Saade; David M Haas; Ronald Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Brian Mercer; Samuel I Parry; Robert M Silver
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Intrauterine growth restriction: effects of physiological fetal growth determinants on diagnosis.

Authors:  Kjell Haram; Eirik Søfteland; Radek Bukowski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-06-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.