Literature DB >> 12699801

Maternal complications following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping.

Maria Cederholm1, Bengt Haglund, Ove Axelsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling increase the risk of bleeding, placental abruption, complications related to amniotic cavity and membranes, abnormal labour, operative deliveries and to investigate the impact of gestational length at the time of the procedure.
DESIGN: A population-based cohort study.
SETTING: Sweden, 1991-1996. POPULATION: All women, 35 to 49 years old, with single births (N = 71,586). The women were classified as exposed to amniocentesis (N = 21,748) or chorionic villus sampling (N = 1984) or not exposed (N = 47,854).
METHODS: Maternal outcomes were collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register. With Logistic regression analyses odds ratios were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and adjusted odds ratios of bleeding, complications related to amniotic cavity and membranes, abnormal labour and operative deliveries. Women exposed to amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling were compared with women non-exposed.
RESULTS: Neither amniocentesis nor chorionic villus sampling was associated with severe pregnancy complications such as placental abruption or placenta praevia. Women in the amniocentesis group had a lower chance of normal delivery (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.97), an increased risk of complications related to amniotic cavity and membranes (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) and hypotonic uterine dysfunction (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.18). The risks were higher for amniocentesis before 15 weeks of gestation. Women in the amniocentesis group were more often delivered by forceps or vacuum extractions (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19) and elective caesarean sections (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16). For the chorionic villus sampling group, no significant associations were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Among women aged 35-49 years, amniocentesis is not associated with important adverse outcomes such as abruption or placenta praevia. Minor associations were found for other maternal complications when amniocentesis was performed before 15 weeks of gestation. Improved methods to identify women with increased risk of chromosomally abnormal pregnancies might minimise the number of women exposed to invasive procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in medical diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection.

Authors:  Irina A Buhimschi; Unzila A Nayeri; Christine A Laky; Sonya-Abdel Razeq; Antonette T Dulay; Catalin S Buhimschi
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2012-08-17

2.  Management of suspected primary Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in Norway: twenty years of experience of amniocentesis in a low-prevalence population.

Authors:  Gry Findal; Anne Helbig; Guttorm Haugen; Pål A Jenum; Babill Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  Aspiration in injections: should we continue or abandon the practice?

Authors:  Yasir Sepah; Lubna Samad; Arshad Altaf; Muhammad Sohail Halim; Nithya Rajagopalan; Aamir Javed Khan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-07-10

4.  Karyotyping and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Women Requesting Amniocentesis for Isolated Sonographic Soft Markers or Advanced Maternal Age.

Authors:  Panagiota Tzela; Nikolaos Antonakopoulos; Panagiotis Anastasopoulos; Kleanthi Gourounti
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2021-12

5.  Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Pawel Sadlecki; Marek Grabiec; Pawel Walentowicz; Malgorzata Walentowicz-Sadlecka
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.