Literature DB >> 12699456

Electrophysiological studies in migraine: a comprehensive review of their interest and limitations.

A Ambrosini1, A M de Noordhout, P S Sándor, J Schoenen.   

Abstract

Electrophysiological methods may help to unravel some of the pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine. Lack of habituation is the principal and most reproducible interictal abnormality in sensory processing in migraineurs. It is found in evoked potential (EP) studies for every stimulation modality including nociceptive stimuli, and it is likely to be responsible for the increased intensity dependence of EP. We have hypothesized that deficient EP habituation in migraine could be due to a reduced preactivation level of sensory cortices because of hypofunctioning subcortico-cortical aminergic pathways. This is not in keeping with simple hyperexcitability of the cortex, which has been suggested by some, but not all, studies of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A recent study of the effects of repetitive TMS on visual EP strongly supports the hypothesis that migraine is characterized by interictal cortical hypoexcitability. With regard to pain mechanisms in migraine, electrophysiological studies of trigeminal pathways using nociceptive blink and corneal reflexes have confirmed that sensitization of central trigeminal nociceptors occurs during migraine attacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699456     DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00571.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  22 in total

Review 1.  Migraine and trigeminal system-I can feel it coming….

Authors:  Antonio Russo; Alessandro Tessitore; Gioacchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-10

2.  The locus of flicker adaptation in the migraine visual system: a dichoptic study.

Authors:  Michel Thabet; Frances Wilkinson; Hugh R Wilson; Olivera Karanovic
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 3.  [Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in basic and clinical neuroscience research].

Authors:  A Valero-Cabré; A Pascual-Leone; O A Coubard
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 4.  Serotonin and migraine: a reconsideration of the central theory.

Authors:  Alessandro Panconesi
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Neurofeedback and biofeedback with 37 migraineurs: a clinical outcome study.

Authors:  Deborah A Stokes; Martha S Lappin
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.759

6.  Interictal cortical hyperresponsiveness in migraine is directly related to the presence of aura.

Authors:  Ritobrato Datta; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Siyuan Hu; John A Detre; Brett Cucchiara
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.292

7.  State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Elena A Allen; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  [Cortical dysbalance in the brain in migraineurs--hyperexcitability as the result of sensitisation?].

Authors:  A Stankewitz; A May
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 9.  Migraine is associated with altered processing of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Andrea M Harriott; Todd J Schwedt
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-11

10.  Interhemispheric differences of fMRI responses to visual stimuli in patients with side-fixed migraine aura.

Authors:  Anders Hougaard; Faisal Mohammad Amin; Michael B Hoffmann; Egill Rostrup; Henrik B W Larsson; Mohammad Sohail Asghar; Vibeke Andrée Larsen; Jes Olesen; Messoud Ashina
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.