Literature DB >> 12699302

Bisphosphonates.

Michael R McClung1.   

Abstract

Bisphosphonates now occupy a prominent position among therapeutic options for the prevention and treatment of various forms of osteoporosis. Their clinical profile of bone-specific efficacy, rapid response, protection from both spine and hip fractures in patients with osteoporosis, and excellent tolerability is all that can be expected of an anti-remodeling drug. Even in the era of anabolic agents, bisphosphonates will continue to be important treatment options. It is not possible to compare or contrast the clinical effectiveness of the various bisphosphonates on the basis of existing data. Despite marked differences in the in vitro potency of drugs, the clinical responses to each of the bisphosphonates discussed above are similar. New bisphosphonates may not be more effective but will provide different tolerability profiles and different routes of administration, thereby increasing the number of patients in whom bisphosphonates can be used. Having these effective agents challenges clinicians to identify the most appropriate patients for bisphosphonate use and to develop strategies to improve acceptance of and adherence to these useful agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699302     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8529(02)00079-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8529            Impact factor:   4.741


  11 in total

1.  Bisphosphonate treatment of type I diabetic mice prevents early bone loss but accentuates suppression of bone formation.

Authors:  Lindsay M Coe; Srinivasan Arjun Tekalur; Yutian Shu; Melissa J Baumann; Laura R McCabe
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  What is the best balance of benefits and risks among anti-resorptive therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Authors:  P D Miller; R J Derman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Multimodality treatment of a multifocal osteoblastoma-like tumor of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Mait; Giorgio Perino; Aasis Unnanuntana; Tai-Li Chang; Stephen Doty; Robert Schneider; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Impact of compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy on health care costs and utilization.

Authors:  J A Sunyecz; L Mucha; O Baser; C E Barr; M M Amonkar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Potential new drug targets for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Chad Deal
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol       Date:  2009-01

6.  Complications of new medications.

Authors:  Carlos J Roldan; Linda Paniagua
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-13

7.  Evaluation of the predisposing factors and involved outcome of surgical treatment in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw cases including bone biopsies.

Authors:  Tae-Hwan Kim; Won-Gyo Seo; Chul-Hong Koo; Jae-Hoon Lee
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 8.  Key Triggers of Osteoclast-Related Diseases and Available Strategies for Targeted Therapies: A Review.

Authors:  Haidi Bi; Xing Chen; Song Gao; Xiaolong Yu; Jun Xiao; Bin Zhang; Xuqiang Liu; Min Dai
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 9.  Prospect of Stem Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Babak Arjmand; Masoumeh Sarvari; Sepideh Alavi-Moghadam; Moloud Payab; Parisa Goodarzi; Kambiz Gilany; Neda Mehrdad; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 10.  Potential role of odanacatib in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kong Wah Ng
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.