Literature DB >> 1269918

The distribution of enzyme and inversion polymorphism over the genome of Drosophila: evidence against balancing selection.

E Zouros.   

Abstract

In species of repleta group of Drosophila about 70% of the electrophoretic variability is absorbed by the same chromosome which absorbs about 70% of the cytological variability of the group. However, this does not imply that inversions are actively involved in the maintenance of protein variation. A comparison of cytological and electrophoretic variation of homologous chromosomes points out that the amount of cytological polymorphism varies greatly over species of Drosophila while electrophoretic variation does not. This suggests that allelozymes do not constitute part of the coadapted complexes of genes characterizing the inversions. Rather, the amount of electropheptide molecule and is largely independent of factors such as background genotype and differences in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1269918      PMCID: PMC1213498     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism.

Authors:  T Ota
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  S Prakash; R C Lewontin; J L Hubby
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XII. Linkage disequilibrium in a large local population.

Authors:  T Muki; T K Watanabe; O Yamaguchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genic versus chromosomal variation in natural populations of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  E Zouros
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni.

Authors:  F J Ayala; J R Powell; M L Tracey; C A Mourão; S Pérez-Salas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Patterns of gene variation in central and marginal populations of Drosophila robusta.

Authors:  S Prakash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Molecular evolution of two linked genes, Est-6 and Sod, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E S Balakirev; E I Balakirev; F Rodríguez-Trelles; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Toward a physical map of Drosophila buzzatii. Use of randomly amplified polymorphic dna polymorphisms and sequence-tagged site landmarks.

Authors:  H Laayouni; M Santos; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Extension of longevity in Drosophila mojavensis by environmental ethanol: differences between subraces.

Authors:  W T Starmer; W B Heed; E S Rockwood-Sluss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chromosomal homology and molecular organization of Muller's elements D and E in the Drosophila repleta species group.

Authors:  J M Ranz; C Segarra; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Distribution of genetic diversity in relation to chromosomal inversions in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  K D Mathiopoulos; G C Lanzaro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Differential response to environmental alcohol among second-chromosome arrangements in experimental populations of Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  A Ruiz; M Santos; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1987-12-15       Impact factor: 1.082

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.