Literature DB >> 12697185

Arsenic(V) removal with a Ce(IV)-doped iron oxide adsorbent.

Yu Zhang1, Min Yang, Xia Huang.   

Abstract

The removal of arsenic(V) by a new Ce-Fe adsorbent was evaluated under various conditions. Under an initial As(V) of 1.0 mg l(-1), the adsorption capacity of the Ce-Fe absorbent was constant around a value of 16 mgg(-1) over a wide pH range (3-7), while a maximum adsorption capacity of 8.3 mgg(-1) was obtained over a narrow pH range around 5.5 for activated alumina, a conventional adsorbent. Kinetics of adsorption obeys a pseudo-first-order rate equation with the rate constant K(ad) as 1.84 x 10(-3) min(-1). The pattern of adsorption of As(V) by the adsorbent fitted well both the Langmuir and Freundlich models. A Langmuir Q(0) of 70.4 mgg(-1) was obtained at an initial pH of 5.0 and temperature of 20 degrees C, significantly higher than those of other adsorbents reported. Phosphate seriously inhibited the removal of As(V) while fluoride did not compete with As(V) even at an F/As molar ratio as high as 30, suggesting that the adsorption sites for As(V) and fluoride were different. Salinity, hardness, and other inorganic anions such as Cl(-), NO(3)(-), and SO(4)(2-) had no apparent effect on As(V) adsorption. Fourier transform infrared spectra of Ce-Fe adsorbent before and after As(V) adsorption demonstrated that M-OH groups plays an important role for As(V) ions removal in the adsorption mechanisms of Ce-Fe adsorbent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12697185     DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00850-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  8 in total

1.  Adsorption of As(III) versus As(V) from aqueous solutions by cerium-loaded volcanic rocks.

Authors:  Tsegaye Girma Asere; Kim Verbeken; Dejene A Tessema; Fekadu Fufa; Christian V Stevens; Gijs Du Laing
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Low-cost magnetic adsorbent for As(III) removal from water: adsorption kinetics and isotherms.

Authors:  Sarita Kango; Rajesh Kumar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Arsenic removal using natural biomaterial-based sorbents.

Authors:  Linda Ansone; Maris Klavins; Arturs Viksna
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 4.  Nanostructured Materials for Water Purification: Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions and Organic Dyes.

Authors:  Won San Choi; Ha-Jin Lee
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 5.  Arsenic removal methods for drinking water in the developing countries: technological developments and research needs.

Authors:  Fayzul Kabir; Shakhawat Chowdhury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Removal of arsenic(v) from aqueous solutions using sulfur-doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

Authors:  Junhui Liu; Long Kong; Xueqiong Huang; Min Liu; Liang Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Enhanced Arsenate Removal Performance in Aqueous Solution by Yttrium-Based Adsorbents.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Lee; Kyoung-Woong Kim; Byung-Tae Lee; Sunbaek Bang; Hyunseok Kim; Hyorang Kang; Am Jang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Biosorbents for Removing Hazardous Metals and Metalloids.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Inoue; Durga Parajuli; Kedar Nath Ghimire; Biplob Kumar Biswas; Hidetaka Kawakita; Tatsuya Oshima; Keisuke Ohto
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.