Literature DB >> 12696819

Conditionals and conditional probability.

Jonathan S t B T Evans1, Simon J Handley, David E Over.   

Abstract

The authors report 3 experiments in which participants were invited to judge the probability of statements of the form if p then q given frequency information about the cases pq, p not q, not pq, and not p not q (where not = not). Three hypotheses were compared: (a) that people equate the probability with that of the material conditional, 1 - P(p not q); (b) that people assign the conditional probability, P(q/p); and (c) that people assign the conjunctive probability P(pq). The experimental evidence allowed rejection of the 1st hypothesis but provided some support for the 2nd and 3rd hypotheses. Individual difference analyses showed that half of the participants used conditional probability and that most of the remaining participants used conjunctive probability as the basis of their judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12696819     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

1.  Conditional and syllogistic deductive tasks dissociate functionally during premise integration.

Authors:  Carlo Reverberi; Paolo Cherubini; Richard S J Frackowiak; Carlo Caltagirone; Eraldo Paulesu; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: extension and evaluation.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

3.  Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.

Authors:  Sonja M Geiger; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

4.  A successive-conditionalization approach to disjunctive and syllogistic reasoning.

Authors:  In-Mao Liu; Ting-Hsi Chou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-15

5.  Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity.

Authors:  Henry Markovits; Janie Brisson; Pier-Luc de Chantal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

6.  Reasoning as we read: establishing the probability of causal conditionals.

Authors:  Matthew Haigh; Andrew J Stewart; Louise Connell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

7.  Is reasoning from counterfactual antecedents evidence for counterfactual reasoning?

Authors:  Eva Rafetseder; Josef Perner
Journal:  Think Reason       Date:  2010-05

Review 8.  Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks.

Authors:  Benjamin Margolin Rottman; Reid Hastie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Thinking about conditionals: a study of individual differences.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans; Simon J Handley; Helen Nelzens; David E Over
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

10.  Different developmental patterns of simple deductive and probabilistic inferential reasoning.

Authors:  Henry Markovits; Valerie Thompson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.