Literature DB >> 12696084

No influence of magnetic fields on cell cycle progression using conditions relevant for patients during MRI.

Ilka B Schiffer1, Wolfgang G Schreiber, Robert Graf, Elke M Schreiber, Detlev Jung, Dirk M Rose, Manfred Hehn, Susanne Gebhard, Jens Sagemüller, Hans W Spiess, Franz Oesch, Manfred Thelen, Jan G Hengstler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether exposure to magnetic fields (MFs) relevant for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clinical routine influences cell cycle progression in two tumor cell lines in vitro. HL60 and EA2 cells were exposed to four types of MFs: (i) static MF of 1.5 and 7.05 T, (ii) extremely low frequency magnetic gradient fields (ELFMGFs) with +/- 10 mT/m and 100 Hz, as well as +/- 100 mT/m and 100 Hz, (iii) pulsed high frequency MF in the radiofrequency (RF) range (63.6 MHz, 5.8 microT), and (iv) a combination of (i-iii). Exposure periods ranged from 1 to 24 h. Cell cycle distribution (G(0)/G(1), S, and G(2)/M phases) was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell cycle analysis did not reveal differences between the exposed and the control cells. As expected, positive controls with irradiated (8 Gy) HL60 and EA2 cells showed a strong G(2)/M arrest. Using conditions that are relevant for patients during MRI, no influence of MFs on cell cycle progression was observed in these cell lines. Care was taken to control secondary parameters of influence, such as vibration by the MR scanner or temperature to avoid false positive results. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12696084     DOI: 10.1002/bem.10097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  9 in total

Review 1.  Safety concerns related to magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  Amanda K Andriola Silva; Erica L Silva; E Sócrates T Egito; Artur S Carriço
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the active second stage of labour: proof of principle.

Authors:  F V Güttler; A Heinrich; J Rump; M de Bucourt; B Schnackenburg; C Bamberg; B Hamm; U K Teichgräber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giulio Giovannetti; Nicola Vanello; Massimo Lombardi; Luigi Landini; Silvana Simi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Effect of static magnetic field on experimental dermal wound strength.

Authors:  Yahya Ekici; Cem Aydogan; Cenk Balcik; Nihan Haberal; Mahir Kirnap; Gokhan Moray; Mehmet Haberal
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05

5.  Impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on human lymphocyte DNA integrity.

Authors:  Michael Fiechter; Julia Stehli; Tobias A Fuchs; Svetlana Dougoud; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  A novel single pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone repair.

Authors:  Yin-Chih Fu; Chih-Chun Lin; Je-Ken Chang; Chung-Hwan Chen; I-Chun Tai; Gwo-Jaw Wang; Mei-Ling Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Static Magnetic Field Stimulation Enhances Oligodendrocyte Differentiation and Secretion of Neurotrophic Factors.

Authors:  Ankshita Prasad; Daniel B Loong Teh; Agata Blasiak; Chou Chai; Yang Wu; Payam M Gharibani; In Hong Yang; Thang T Phan; Kah Leong Lim; Hyunsoo Yang; Xiaogang Liu; Angelo H All
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cell type- and density-dependent effect of 1 T static magnetic field on cell proliferation.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Xinmiao Ji; Xingxing Yang; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

9.  Static magnetic fields modulate X-ray-induced DNA damage in human glioblastoma primary cells.

Authors:  Laura Teodori; Anna Giovanetti; Maria Cristina Albertini; Marco Rocchi; Barbara Perniconi; Maria Giovanna Valente; Dario Coletti
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.724

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.