Literature DB >> 12696057

Solvation parameters for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins: transferability and entropic effects.

Bedamati Das1, Hagai Meirovitch.   

Abstract

A new procedure for optimizing parameters of implicit solvation models introduced by us has been applied successfully first to cyclic peptides and more recently to three surface loops of ribonuclease A (Das and Meirovitch, Proteins 2001;43:303-314) using the simplified model E(tot) = E(FF)(epsilon = nr) + Sigma(i) sigma(i)A(i), where sigma(i) are atomic solvation parameters (ASPs) to be optimized, A(i) is the solvent accessible surface area of atom i, E(FF)(epsilon = nr) is the AMBER force-field energy of the loop-loop and loop-template interactions with a distance-dependent dielectric constant, epsilon = nr, where n is a parameter. The loop is free to move while the protein template is held fixed in its X-ray structure; an extensive conformational search for energy minimized loop structures is carried out with our local torsional deformation method. The optimal ASPs and n are those for which the structure with the lowest minimized energy [E(tot)(n,sigma(i))] becomes the experimental X-ray structure, or less strictly, the energy gap between these structures is within 2-3 kcal/mol. To check if a set of ASPs can be defined, which is transferable to a large number of loops, we optimize individual sets of ASPs (based on n = 2) for 12 surface loops from which an "averaged" best-fit set is defined. This set is then applied to the 12 loops and an independent "test" group of 8 loops leading in most cases to very small RMSD values; thus, this set can be useful for structure prediction of loops in homology modeling. For three loops we also calculate the free energy gaps to find that they are only slightly smaller than their energy counterparts, indicating that only larger n will enable reducing too large gaps. Because of its simplicity, this model allowed carrying out an extensive application of our methodology, providing thereby a large number of benchmark results for comparison with future calculations based on n > 2 as well as on more sophisticated solvation models with as yet unknown performance for loops. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12696057     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  6 in total

1.  Ab initio computational modeling of long loops in G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Amitava Roy; Ernest L Mehler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Optimization of the GB/SA solvation model for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins.

Authors:  Agnieszka Szarecka; Hagai Meirovitch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Minimalist explicit solvation models for surface loops in proteins.

Authors:  Ronald P White; Hagai Meirovitch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  Template-based protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Andras Fiser
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

5.  Development of a new physics-based internal coordinate mechanics force field and its application to protein loop modeling.

Authors:  Yelena A Arnautova; Ruben A Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-02

6.  Generation of a flexible loop structural ensemble and its application to induced-fit structural changes following ligand binding.

Authors:  Yukihisa S Watanabe; Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Biophysics (Nagoya-shi)       Date:  2006-01-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.