AIM: An investigation into the objective criteria of shoulder mobility possesses special meaning for diagnostic documentation, the evaluation of therapy and the effects of rehabilitation in the treatment of diseases of the shoulder. In order to ascertain the criteria which characterise shoulder mobility, it is necessary to have a tool available that is objective, comparable and allows the complexity, variability and range of motion to be recorded. Motion analysis represents one such standard procedure used to measure joint movement. METHOD: Accordingly, a marker- based motion analysis of the wrist and elbow, a marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis system for the upper extremities was developed. We evaluated 10 healthy subjects without shoulder conditions and 8 patients with impingement syndrome (7 operative, 1 conservative therapy). RESULTS: The healthy subjects revealed a reproducible motion curve for the specific motion tested. The curves were defined as the normal standard and we used them for comparative purposes. In the treatment group, an improvement of the 3D range of motion could be documented for the affected shoulder following rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: It can be stated that this newly developed marker-based procedure for the three-dimensional motion analysis is suitable for recording complex unconstrained movements. This was found to be more relevant for the assessment of the ability of patients to manage the physical demands of daily living than traditional clinical tests. Furthermore, the information gained from motion analysis of the upper extremities will play a valuable role in the future for quality control during diagnosis and treatment, as well as for the design of shoulder rehabilitation programs.
AIM: An investigation into the objective criteria of shoulder mobility possesses special meaning for diagnostic documentation, the evaluation of therapy and the effects of rehabilitation in the treatment of diseases of the shoulder. In order to ascertain the criteria which characterise shoulder mobility, it is necessary to have a tool available that is objective, comparable and allows the complexity, variability and range of motion to be recorded. Motion analysis represents one such standard procedure used to measure joint movement. METHOD: Accordingly, a marker- based motion analysis of the wrist and elbow, a marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis system for the upper extremities was developed. We evaluated 10 healthy subjects without shoulder conditions and 8 patients with impingement syndrome (7 operative, 1 conservative therapy). RESULTS: The healthy subjects revealed a reproducible motion curve for the specific motion tested. The curves were defined as the normal standard and we used them for comparative purposes. In the treatment group, an improvement of the 3D range of motion could be documented for the affected shoulder following rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: It can be stated that this newly developed marker-based procedure for the three-dimensional motion analysis is suitable for recording complex unconstrained movements. This was found to be more relevant for the assessment of the ability of patients to manage the physical demands of daily living than traditional clinical tests. Furthermore, the information gained from motion analysis of the upper extremities will play a valuable role in the future for quality control during diagnosis and treatment, as well as for the design of shoulder rehabilitation programs.