Literature DB >> 12695079

A novel bioreactor for the dynamic flexural stimulation of tissue engineered heart valve biomaterials.

George C Engelmayr1, Daniel K Hildebrand, Fraser W H Sutherland, John E Mayer, Michael S Sacks.   

Abstract

Dynamic flexure is a major mode of deformation in the native heart valve cusp, and may effect the mechanical and biological development of tissue engineered heart valves (TEHV). To explore this hypothesis, a novel bioreactor was developed to study the effect of dynamic flexural stimulation on TEHV biomaterials. It was implemented in a study to compare the effect of uni-directional cyclic flexure on the effective stiffness of two candidate TEHV scaffolds: a non-woven mesh of polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers, and a non-woven mesh of PGA and poly L-lactic acid (PLLA) fibers, both coated with poly 4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB). The bioreactor has the capacity to dynamically flex 12 rectangular samples (25 x 7.5 x 2mm) under sterile conditions in a cell culture incubator. Sterility was maintained in the bioreactor for at least 5 weeks of incubation. Flexure tests to measure the effective stiffness in the "with-flexure" (WF) and opposing "against-flexure" (AF) directions indicated that dynamically flexed PGA/PLLA/P4HB scaffolds were approximately 72% (3 weeks) and 76% (5 weeks) less stiff than static controls (p<0.01), and that they developed directional anisotropy by 3 weeks of incubation (stiffer AF, p<0.01). In contrast, both dynamically flexed and static PGA/P4HB scaffolds exhibited a trend of decreased stiffness with incubation, with no development of directional anisotropy. Dynamically flexed PGA/P4HB scaffolds were significantly less stiff than static controls at 3 weeks (p<0.05). Scanning electron microscopy revealed signs of heterogeneous P4HB coating and fiber disruption, suggesting possible explanations for the observed mechanical properties. These results indicate that dynamic flexure can produce quantitative and qualitative changes in the mechanical properties of TEHV scaffolds, and suggest that these differences need to be accounted for when comparing the effects of mechanical stimulation on the development of cell-seeded TEHV constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12695079     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00051-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  38 in total

Review 1.  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research perspectives for pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Simultaneous application of interstitial flow and cyclic mechanical strain to a three-dimensional cell-seeded hydrogel.

Authors:  Peter A Galie; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  EMT-inducing biomaterials for heart valve engineering: taking cues from developmental biology.

Authors:  M K Sewell-Loftin; Young Wook Chun; Ali Khademhosseini; W David Merryman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A novel flex-stretch-flow bioreactor for the study of engineered heart valve tissue mechanobiology.

Authors:  George C Engelmayr; Lorenzo Soletti; Sarah C Vigmostad; Stephanus G Budilarto; William J Federspiel; Krishnan B Chandran; David A Vorp; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A novel bioreactor for mechanobiological studies of engineered heart valve tissue formation under pulmonary arterial physiological flow conditions.

Authors:  Sharan Ramaswamy; Steven M Boronyak; Trung Le; Andrew Holmes; Fotis Sotiropoulos; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 7.  Heart Valve Biomechanics and Underlying Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Salma Ayoub; Giovanni Ferrari; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Frederick J Schoen; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.090

8.  On the biomechanical role of glycosaminoglycans in the aortic heart valve leaflet.

Authors:  Chad E Eckert; Rong Fan; Brandon Mikulis; Mathew Barron; Christopher A Carruthers; Vincent M Friebe; Naren R Vyavahare; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Design and physical characterization of a synchronous multivalve aortic valve culture system.

Authors:  Christopher A Durst; K Jane Grande-Allen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Interlayer micromechanics of the aortic heart valve leaflet.

Authors:  Rachel M Buchanan; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.