Literature DB >> 12694748

Use of HepG2 cell line for direct or indirect mutagens screening: comparative investigation between comet and micronucleus assays.

Isabelle Valentin-Severin1, Ludovic Le Hegarat, Jean-Claude Lhuguenot, Anne-Marie Le Bon, Marie-Christine Chagnon.   

Abstract

In the present study, DNA-damage and clastogenic or aneugenic effects of genotoxic compounds were examined in a metabolically competent human cell line (HepG2 cells) using the micronucleus and the comet assays. Compounds with various action mechanisms were tested: direct mutagens such as 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (4-NQO) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and indirect mutagens requiring biotransformation to be active such as N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF). The compounds were first tested for cytotoxicity by measuring their effects on RNA synthesis inhibition in HepG2 cells. 4-NQO, B[a]P and 2-AAF were the most potent compounds; their IC(50) values were, respectively, 1.9 micro M (4h contact), 3.4 and 112 micro M after 20 h. MMS was mildly cytotoxic (IC(50)=0.9 mM) and NDMA had a weak effect (IC(50)=110 mM) after 4h contact. In the micronucleus and comet assays, concentrations required to obtain a significant genotoxic effect in HepG2 cells varied over a broad range, NDMA being active only at very high concentrations. To compare the sensitivity of the two assays, we measured the so-called FIC(2)-the concentration necessary to induce a 2-fold increase of the measured genotoxicity parameter. The data show that genotoxic effects were consistently observed at lower concentrations in the micronucleus test, except in the case of MMS. The measured FIC(2) values were 0.12 micro M (4-NQO), 0.17 micro M (2-AAF), 0.26 micro M (B[a]P) and 6.4mM (NDMA). MMS had such a weak effect in the HepG2 cells that we could not calculate its FIC(2) value. In the comet assay, FIC(2) values were observed, respectively, at 1.48 micro M (4-NQO), 3.67 micro M (B[a]P), 13.42 micro M (MMS) and 27 mM (NDMA). 2-AAF failed to induce DNA-damage in this assay. The present study shows that HepG2 cells could be a suitable tool for assessing the genotoxicity of direct and indirect mutagens and for establishing the lowest genotoxic concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12694748     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(03)00031-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  11 in total

1.  Psidium guajava Leaf Extracts and Their Quercetin Protect HepG2 Cell Lines Against CCL4 Induced Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  K Vijayakumar; R L Rengarajan; R Radhakrishnan; Shilu Mathew; Ishtiaq Qadri; A Vijaya Anand
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2018-04-11

2.  SpheroidChip: Patterned Agarose Microwell Compartments Harboring HepG2 Spheroids are Compatible with Genotoxicity Testing.

Authors:  Christy Chao; P Ngo Le; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-03-02

3.  Genotoxicity of microcystin-LR in in vitro and in vivo experimental models.

Authors:  Elsa Dias; Henriqueta Louro; Miguel Pinto; Telma Santos; Susana Antunes; Paulo Pereira; Maria João Silva
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Inhibitory activity of pentacyano(isoniazid)ferrate(II), IQG-607, against promastigotes and amastigotes forms of Leishmania braziliensis.

Authors:  Camila F Amorim; Luiza Galina; Natália B Carvalho; Nathalia D M Sperotto; Kenia Pissinate; Pablo Machado; Maria M Campos; Luiz A Basso; Valnês S Rodrigues-Junior; Edgar M Carvalho; Diógenes Santiago Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Following the adverse outcome pathway from micronucleus to cancer using H2B-eGFP transgenic healthy stem cells.

Authors:  Bastian Niklas Hölzel; Kurt Pfannkuche; Bernhard Allner; Hans Thomas Allner; Jürgen Hescheler; Daniel Derichsweiler; Henner Hollert; Andreas Schiwy; Julia Brendt; Michael Schaffeld; Alexander Froschauer; Petra Stahlschmidt-Allner
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  HepGentox: a novel promising HepG2 reportergene-assay for the detection of genotoxic substances in complex mixtures.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Christina Friedl; Alexandra Irnesberger; Thomas Czerny; Tina Piwonka; Alfonso Peñarroya; Manfred Tacker; Elisabeth Riegel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Investigating the impact of long term exposure to chemical agents on the chromosomal radiosensitivity using human lymphoblastoid GM1899A cells.

Authors:  Otilia Nuta; Simon Bouffler; David Lloyd; Elizabeth Ainsbury; Ovnair Sepai; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Use of HuH6 and other human-derived hepatoma lines for the detection of genotoxins: a new hope for laboratory animals?

Authors:  Monika Waldherr; Miroslav Mišík; Franziska Ferk; Jana Tomc; Bojana Žegura; Metka Filipič; Wolfgang Mikulits; Sören Mai; Oskar Haas; Wolfgang W Huber; Elisabeth Haslinger; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Knock-down of AHCY and depletion of adenosine induces DNA damage and cell cycle arrest.

Authors:  Lucija Belužić; Ivana Grbeša; Robert Belužić; Jong Hoon Park; Hyun Kyung Kong; Nevenka Kopjar; Guadalupe Espadas; Eduard Sabidó; Adriana Lepur; Filip Rokić; Ivanka Jerić; Lidija Brkljačić; Oliver Vugrek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The clastogenicity of 4NQO is cell-type dependent and linked to cytotoxicity, length of exposure and p53 proficiency.

Authors:  Katja Brüsehafer; Bella B Manshian; Ann T Doherty; Zoulikha M Zaïr; George E Johnson; Shareen H Doak; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.