Literature DB >> 12694669

Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a phase II trial of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide with comparison to a cohort with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma-a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Jeffrey D Bloss1, Mark F Brady, Shu Yuan Liao, Thomas Rocereto, Edward E Partridge, Daniel L Clarke-Pearson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were first, to assess the clinical effectiveness of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in a phase II study involving a well-defined group of women with extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (EPSPC); and second, to compare these results with those of a group of patients with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (PSOC) who received identical therapy.
METHODS: After primary surgery, patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) every 21 days for six cycles. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical and surgical response to treatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. These patients were then compared with patients with PSOC who received identical treatment on a separate protocol.
RESULTS: Women with a diagnosis of tended to be older that those with EPSPC PSOC (median age: 65.8 years vs 60.3 years, P = 0.04). The estimated probability of clinical response (complete and partial) to the treatment regimen for EPSPC was 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41-85%) compared with 59% (95% CI: 47-71%) for women with PSOC. Surgical complete responses were similar (20% vs 19%) in the two patient groups. Additionally, the death rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (hazard ratio: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.834-1.88).
CONCLUSION: Women with EPSPC and PSOC exhibit a similar probability of response to cisplatin and cyclophosphamide and a similar overall survival. Based on these findings and the fact that results of ovarian cancer trials are frequently extrapolated to patients with EPSPC, it is reasonable to include EPSPC patients in future large-scale treatment trials involving patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12694669     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00068-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  18 in total

1.  Establishment and characterization of a cell line derived from a human serous surface papillary carcinoma of the ovary.

Authors:  Yoichi Kobayashi; Hiroshi Mizuhara; Tatsuru Ohara; Haruhiro Kondo; Sojiro Sato; Kazushige Kiguchi; Bunpei Ishizuka; Isamu Ishiwata; Mamoru Tadokoro
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 2.  Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Danijela Jelovac; Deborah K Armstrong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Photodynamic detection and management of intraperitoneal spreading of primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma in a man: report of a case.

Authors:  Emel Canbay; Haruaki Ishibashi; Shouzou Sako; Toshiyuki Kitai; Eisei Nishino; Masamitsu Hirano; Akiyoshi Mizumoto; Yoshio Endo; Shun-Ichiro Ogura; Yutaka Yonemura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma presenting as a large mesenteric mass mistaken for ovarian cancer: a case of primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji Woo Kim; Hwa Sun Lee; Kyu Sik Shin; Young Ho Gam; Kyung Don Baik
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-05-19

Review 6.  The invasive malignancy from peritoneal epithelial cell: a report of four cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Xue Hongjian; Fan Jiquan; Peng Gang; Cao Rubo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Peritoneal carcinoma in women with genetic susceptibility: implications for Jewish populations.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Chhanda Bewtra
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma: clinicopathological and prognostic factor analyses.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Xiao-ping Li; Heng Cui; Dan-hua Shen; Li-hui Wei
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Rapidly increasing incidence of papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in the United States: fact or artifact?

Authors:  Marc T Goodman; Yurii B Shvetsov
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Clinical characteristics of primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sang Young Roh; Sook Hee Hong; Yoon Ho Ko; Tae Hee Kim; Myung Ah Lee; Byoung Yong Shim; Jae Ho Byun; In Sook Woo; Jin Hyoung Kang; Young Seon Hong; Kyung Shik Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.