Literature DB >> 12694447

Cross-contamination with Salmonella on a broiler slaughterhouse line demonstrated by use of epidemiological markers.

J E Olsen1, D J Brown, M Madsen, M Bisgaard.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate contamination of surfaces on a poultry slaughter line from infected poultry and subsequent cross-contamination of non-infected poultry. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A broiler slaughterhouse was investigated for the presence of Salmonella on 17 defined points over two 1-week periods. Flocks supplied to slaughter and neck skin samples from processed chicken were likewise investigated. Salmonella was detected in 10 out of 18 flocks at ante-mortem inspection, while seven flocks tested positive in the finished products. Equipment at all but one control point at the slaughter line tested positive at least once during the study. The chicken receiving area was the most contaminated. By comparison of typing results from serotyping, plasmid profile typing and phage typing, direct evidence for cross-contamination with Salm. serotype Typhimurium, Salm. Serotype 4.12:b:- and Salm. serotype Virchow on the slaughter line was obtained for four of the flocks. The cleaning procedure in place did not remove all Salmonella from the contaminated areas.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for contamination of equipment on a slaughter line and subsequent cross-contamination to non-infected chicken was provided by typing methods. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study has provided detailed information on cross-contamination on a slaughter line by the use of phage typing and plasmid profiling. The study stresses the importance of controlling Salmonella in the primary production, as contamination of the equipment on the slaughter line will act as a vehicle to contaminate finished products. Cleaning procedures on slaughter lines cannot be expected to control this problem with the current equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12694447     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01911.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  6 in total

1.  Molecular tracking of Salmonella spp. in chicken meat chain: from slaughterhouse reception to end cuts.

Authors:  Mariane Rezende Dias; Valéria Quintana Cavicchioli; Anderson Carlos Camargo; Frederico Germano Piscitelli Alvarenga Lanna; Paulo Sérgio de Arruda Pinto; Luciano Dos Santos Bersot; Luís Augusto Nero
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Population structure of Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:b:- strains and likely sources of human infection.

Authors:  Anne Toboldt; Erhard Tietze; Reiner Helmuth; Ernst Junker; Angelika Fruth; Burkhard Malorny
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Reduction of Salmonella contamination on the surface of chicken skin using bacteriophage.

Authors:  Robert Joseph Atterbury; Adriano Marcelo Gigante; María de la Salud Rubio Lozano; Ruben Danilo Méndez Medina; Gareth Robinson; Habib Alloush; Paul Andrew Barrow; Vivien Mary Allen
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.099

4.  The transcriptional programme of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium reveals a key role for tryptophan metabolism in biofilms.

Authors:  Shea Hamilton; Roy J M Bongaerts; Francis Mulholland; Brett Cochrane; Jonathan Porter; Sacha Lucchini; Hilary M Lappin-Scott; Jay C D Hinton
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Effects of climatic elements on Salmonella contamination in broiler chicken meat in Japan.

Authors:  Kanako Ishihara; Chisato Nakazawa; Shizuka Nomura; Shaheem Elahi; Megumi Yamashita; Hiroshi Fujikawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Prevalence of Salmonella enterica on poultry processing equipment after completion of sanitization procedures.

Authors:  Tomi Obe; Rama Nannapaneni; Wes Schilling; Li Zhang; Chris McDaniel; Aaron Kiess
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.