Literature DB >> 12693741

Comparisons of three different investigative interview techniques with young children.

Marc A Lindberg1, Mary Tantalo Chapman, David Samsock, Stuart W Thomas, Anders W Lindberg.   

Abstract

After viewing a film of a mother hitting her son, a film not seen by the college student interviewers, children were misinformed about a detail (via exposure to a misleading question) as well as explicitly coached to disclose 3 false details. The children were then interviewed by interviewers who had previously learned 1 of 3 different interviewing procedures: the Yuille Step-Wise Interview developed by J. C. Yuille, R. Hunter, R. Joffe, & J. Zapamiuk (1993); a doll play interview developed by Action for Child Protection Inc. (1994); or the Modified Structured Interview developed for this study. The Modified Structured Interview yielded more "where" information and was better at detecting if coaching had occurred. However, the interviewers were not very good at discriminating suggested versus coached versus correct witnessed information. The authors found that the deeper one digs for memories, the more one uncovers incorrect versus correct items. They concluded that although the Modified Structured Interview was superior to the techniques currently in use, cautions are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12693741     DOI: 10.1080/00221320309597500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1325            Impact factor:   1.509


  1 in total

1.  Divining Testimony? The Impact of Interviewing Props on Children's Reports of Touching.

Authors:  Debra Ann Poole; Maggie Bruck
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2012-07-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.