Literature DB >> 12693619

Fetuses subsequently born premature are smaller than gestational age-matched fetuses not born premature.

Peter M Doubilet1, Carol B Benson, Louise Wilkins-Haug, Steven Ringer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether singleton fetuses in pregnancies that subsequently deliver prematurely are smaller than singleton fetuses of the same gestational age who are not born premature.
METHODS: Our study population consisted of singleton pregnancies meeting the following criteria: at least 1 first-trimester sonogram (to ensure accurate dating), at least 1 sonogram after 24 weeks' gestation, and a known delivery date. Controlling for gestational age at sonography using analysis of covariance, we compared very premature fetuses (delivery at 24-29.9 weeks; n = 26) and moderately premature fetuses (delivery at 30-36.9 weeks; n = 306) with nonpremature fetuses (n = 1,838) with respect to the following sonographic parameters: abdominal diameter, femur length, biparietal diameter, and estimated fetal weight.
RESULTS: On 24- to 29.9-week sonograms, fetuses who were subsequently born very premature had significantly smaller fetal measurements than did fetuses who were not born premature (P < .05 for all parameters). Even after excluding 9 very premature fetuses with a risk factor for uteroplacental insufficiency (e.g., toxemia or hypertension), the remaining 17 fetuses had significantly smaller abdominal diameters, femur lengths, and estimated fetal weights than nonpremature fetuses (P < .05). Sonographic parameters in moderately premature fetuses were smaller than in nonpremature fetuses on 30- to 36.9-week sonograms (P < .05 for all parameters), but the only parameters that differed significantly between these 2 groups on 24- to 29.9-week sonograms were abdominal diameter and femur length. CONCLUSIONS. Singleton fetuses subsequently born premature are smaller than gestational age-matched fetuses not born premature, even in the absence of an identifiable cause of growth restriction. The lag in growth appears to occur in the last few weeks before delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12693619     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.4.359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  7 in total

Review 1.  An epigenetic association of malformations, adverse reproductive outcomes, and fetal origins hypothesis related effects.

Authors:  Mark Lubinsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Anthropometric charts for infants with trisomies 21, 18, or 13 born between 22 weeks gestation and term: the VON charts.

Authors:  Nansi S Boghossian; Jeffrey D Horbar; Jeffrey C Murray; Joseph H Carpenter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Executive summary of the workshop "Nutritional Challenges in the High Risk Infant".

Authors:  Rosemary D Higgins; Sherin Devaskar; William W Hay; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Frank R Greer; Kathleen Kennedy; Paula Meier; LuAnn Papile; Michael P Sherman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Early rapid growth, early birth: accelerated fetal growth and spontaneous late preterm birth.

Authors:  Michelle Lampl; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Jimmy Espinoza; Francesca Gotsch; Luis Goncalves; Sonia Hassan; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Edward A Frongillo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.937

5.  Validation of a model for optimal birth weight: a prospective study using serial ultrasounds.

Authors:  Gavin Pereira; Eve Blair; David Lawrence
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 6.  The nexus of prematurity, birth defects, and intrauterine growth restriction: a role for plac1-regulated pathways.

Authors:  Michael E Fant; Juan Fuentes; Xiaoyuan Kong; Suzanne Jackman
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Dynamic Expression Profiles of β-Catenin during Murine Cardiac Valve Development.

Authors:  Lilong Guo; Janiece Glover; Alyssa Risner; Christina Wang; Diana Fulmer; Kelsey Moore; Cortney Gensemer; Mary Kate Rumph; Reece Moore; Tyler Beck; Russell A Norris
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2020-08-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.