Literature DB >> 12693618

Adverse birth outcomes in relation to prenatal sonographic measurements of fetal size.

Rebecca Smith-Bindman1, Philip W Chu, Jeff Ecker, Vickie A Feldstein, Roy A Filly, Peter Bacchetti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and quantify the prediction of multiple neonatal outcomes by sonographically estimated fetal weight across a broad range of gestational ages.
METHODS: A retrospective cohortanalysis was conducted among women with certain gestational age (n = 1,376) seen at the University of California San Francisco from 1994 through 1997. The relative risks for small size at birth, small (low birth weight) for gestational age, and adverse neonatal outcomes were compared between small and average-sized fetuses.
RESULTS: Fetuses with an estimated fetal weight in the 5th percentile or less for gestational age were at increased risk of a birth weight less than 2,000 g (relative risk, 6.5), a birth weight in less than the 3rd percentile for gestational age (relative risk, 10.1), preterm birth (relative risk, 2.2), extreme preterm birth (relative risk, 5.7), prolonged neonatal hospital stay (relative risk, 2.7), neonatal intensive care unit admission (relative risk, 3.2), and stillbirth or neonatal death (relative risk, 7.7) compared with average-sized fetuses (all P < .0001). With intrauterine growth restriction defined as an estimated fetal weight in the 5th percentile or less for gestational age, up to 29% of fetuses with adverse neonatal outcomes were detected, for false-positive rates of only 4% to 5%. After adjusting for confounding variables, low estimated fetal weight remained a significant predictor of neonatal morbidity and mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality are significantly increased among fetuses with an estimated fetal weight in the 5th percentile or less for gestational age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12693618     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.4.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  5 in total

1.  Tracking of fetal growth characteristics during different trimesters and the risks of adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Romy Gaillard; Eric Ap Steegers; Johan C de Jongste; Albert Hofman; Vincent Wv Jaddoe
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

3.  Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Alexander Ep Heazell; Dexter Jl Hayes; Melissa Whitworth; Yemisi Takwoingi; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Birth weight prediction models for the different gestational age stages in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Chunhui Li; Yang Peng; Bin Zhang; Weiying Ji; Li Li; Jianhua Gong; Wei Xia; Yuanyuan Li; Shuna Jin; Ranran Song; Youjie Wang; Shunqing Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Associations of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and fetal intrauterine development.

Authors:  Rui Qin; Ye Ding; Qun Lu; Yangqian Jiang; Jiangbo Du; Ci Song; Hong Lv; Siyuan Lv; Shiyao Tao; Lei Huang; Xin Xu; Cong Liu; Tao Jiang; Zhixu Wang; Hongxia Ma; Guangfu Jin; Yankai Xia; Zhibin Hu; Feng Zhang; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.