Literature DB >> 12692104

A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning.

Laura M Koehly1, Susan K Peterson, Beatty G Watts, Kari K G Kempf, Sally W Vernon, Ellen R Gritz.   

Abstract

Hereditary cancers are relational diseases. A primary focus of research in the past has been the biological relations that exist within the families and how genes are passed along family lines. However, hereditary cancers are relational in a psychosocial sense, as well. They can impact communication relationships within a family, as well as support relationships among family members. Furthermore, the familial culture can affect an individual's participation in genetic counseling and testing endeavors. Our aims are (a) to describe the composition of familial networks, (b) to characterize the patterns of family functioning within families, (c) to analyze how these patterns relate to communications about genetic counseling and testing among family members, and (d) to identify influential family members. Specifically, we asked how the relationship between mutation status, kinship ties, and family functioning constructs, e.g., communication, cohesion, affective involvement, leadership, and conflict, was associated with discussions about genetic counseling and testing. We used social network analysis and random graph techniques to examine 783 dyadic relationships in 36 members of 5 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families interviewed from 1999-2000. Results suggest that in these five HNPCC families, two family members are more likely to discuss genetic counseling and testing if either one carries the mutation, if either one is a spouse or a first-degree relative of the other, or if the relationship is defined by positive cohesion, leadership, or lack of conflict. Furthermore, the family functioning patterns suggest that mothers tend to be the most influential persons in the family network. Results of this study suggest encouraging family members who act in the mother role to take a "team approach" with the family proband when discussing HNPCC risks and management with family members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12692104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  72 in total

1.  Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-24

Review 2.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Lindsey Hoskins; Sheila Prindiville; Regina Kenen; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Daughter-initiated health advice to mothers: perceptions of African-American and Latina daughters.

Authors:  M Mosavel; T Thomas
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-04-01

7.  Who's asking the important questions? Sexual topics discussed among young pregnant couples.

Authors:  Tashuna Albritton; Kyla Day Fletcher; Anna Divney; Derrick Gordon; Urania Magriples; Trace S Kershaw
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-09-17

8.  Perceived intrafamily melanoma risk communication.

Authors:  Lois J Loescher; Janice D Crist; Leilani A C L Siaki
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Motivations for PrEP-Related Interpersonal Communication Among Women Who Inject Drugs: A Qualitative Egocentric Network Study.

Authors:  Marisa Felsher; Emmanuel Koku; Stephen Lankenau; Kathleen Brady; Scarlett Bellamy; Alexis M Roth
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2020-09-01

10.  Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Susan V Montgomery; Andrea M Barsevick; Brian L Egleston; Ruth Bingler; Karen Ruth; Suzanne M Miller; John Malick; Terrence P Cescon; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.