Literature DB >> 12691405

Radiation exposure of normal temporal bone structures during stereotactically guided gamma knife surgery for vestibular schwannomas.

Mark E Linskey1, Peter A S Johnstone, Michael O'Leary, Steven Goetsch.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The dosimetry of radiation exposure of healthy inner, middle, and external ear structures that leads to hearing loss, tinnitus, facial weakness, dizziness, vertigo, and imbalance after gamma knife surgery (GKS) for vestibular schwannomas (VSs) is unknown. The authors quantified the dose of radiation received by these structures after GKS for VS to assess the likelihood that these doses contributed to postradiosurgery complications.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using a prospectively acquired database of a consecutive series of 54 patients with VS who were treated with GKS during a 3.5-year period at an "open unit" gamma knife center. Point doses were measured for 18 healthy temporal bone structures in each patient, with the anatomical position of each sampling point confirmed by a fellowship-trained neurootologist. These values were compared against single-dose equivalents for the 5-year tolerance dose for a 5% risk of complications and the 5-year tolerance dose for a 50% risk of complications, which were calculated using known 2-Gy/fraction thresholds for chronic otitis, chondromalacia, and osseous necrosis, as well as the tumor margin dose and typical tumor margin prescription doses for patients in whom hearing preservation was attempted. External and middle ear doses were uniformly low. The intratemporal facial nerve is susceptible to unintentionally high radiation exposure at the fundus of the internal auditory canal, with higher than tumor margin doses detected in 26% of cases. In the cochlea, the basal turn near the modiolus and its inferior portion are most susceptible, with doses greater than 12 Gy detected in 10.8 and 14.8% of cases. In the vestibular labyrinth, the ampulated ends of the lateral and posterior semicircular canals are most susceptible, with doses greater than 12 Gy detected in 7.4 and 5.1% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Doses delivered to middle and external ear structures are unlikely to contribute to post-GKS complications, but unexpectedly high doses may be delivered to sensitive areas of the intratemporal facial nerve and inner ear. Unintentional delivery of high doses to the stria vascularis, the sensory neuroepithelium of the inner ear organs and/or their ganglia, may play a role in the development of post-GKS tinnitus, hearing loss, dizziness, vertigo, and imbalance. Minimizing treatment complications post-GKS for VS requires precise dose planning conformality with the three-dimensional surface of the tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12691405     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.4.0800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

1.  Hearing Preservation in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Anthony M Tolisano; Jacob B Hunter
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-10

2.  Change in tinnitus after treatment of vestibular schwannoma: microsurgery vs. gamma knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Soon Hyung Park; Hee So Oh; Ju Hyun Jeon; Yong Ju Lee; In Seok Moon; Won-Sang Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Long-term Outcomes of Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Kang-Min Kim; Chul-Kee Park; Hyun-Tai Chung; Sun Ha Paek; Hee-Won Jung; Dong Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-10-20

Review 4.  Facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Isaac Yang; Michael E Sughrue; Seunggu J Han; Shanna Fang; Derick Aranda; Steven W Cheung; Lawrence H Pitts; Andrew T Parsa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Impact of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation following Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Lawrance K Chung; Nolan Ung; John P Sheppard; Thien Nguyen; Carlito Lagman; Winward Choy; Stephen Tenn; Nader Pouratian; Percy Lee; Tania Kaprealian; Michael Selch; Antonio De Salles; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-11-10

6.  EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Roland Goldbrunner; Michael Weller; Jean Regis; Morten Lund-Johansen; Pantelis Stavrinou; David Reuss; D Gareth Evans; Florence Lefranc; Kita Sallabanda; Andrea Falini; Patrick Axon; Olivier Sterkers; Laura Fariselli; Wolfgang Wick; Joerg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and patients with vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing ear.

Authors:  Erika Celis-Aguilar; Luis Lassaletta; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-28

Review 8.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting Standards.

Authors:  Scott G Soltys; Michael T Milano; Jinyu Xue; Wolfgang A Tomé; Ellen Yorke; Jason Sheehan; George X Ding; John P Kirkpatrick; Lijun Ma; Arjun Sahgal; Timothy Solberg; John Adler; Jimm Grimm; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 8.013

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.