Literature DB >> 12691125

Value of whole-body FDG PET in management of lung cancer.

Kotaro Higashi1, Ichiro Matsunari, Yoshimichi Ueda, Ryosuke Ikeda, Jianfei Guo, Manabu Oguchi, Hisao Tonami, Itaru Yamamoto.   

Abstract

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET imaging provides physiologic and metabolic information that characterizes lesions that are indeterminate by CT. FDG PET imaging is sensitive to the detection of lung cancer in patients who have indeterminate lesions on CT, whereas low grade malignancy such as bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and carcinoid may be negative on FDG PET. The specificity of PET imaging is less than its sensitivity because some inflammatory processes, such as active granulomatous infections, avidly accumulate FDG. This possibility should be kept in mind in the analysis of PET studies of glucose metabolism aimed at differentiating malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules. FDG uptake is considered to be a good marker of cell differentiation, proliferative potential, aggressiveness, and the grade of malignancy in patients with lung cancer. FDG PET accurately stages the distribution of lung cancer. Several studies have documented the increased accuracy of PET compared with CT in the evaluation of the hilar and mediastinal lymphnode status in patients with lung cancer. Whole-body PET studies detect metastatic disease that is unsuspected by conventional imaging. Management changes have been reported in up to 41% of patients on the basis of the results of whole-body studies. Whole-body FDG PET is also useful for the detection of recurrence. Several studies have indicated that the degree of FDG uptake in primary lung cancer can be used as an independent prognostic factor. Thus, whole-body FDG PET is clinically very useful in the management of lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12691125     DOI: 10.1007/BF02988253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  9 in total

1.  Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening? For.

Authors:  Michiru Ide; Yutaka Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Software-based fusion of PET and CT images for suspected recurrent lung cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Michio Senda; Tomohisa Okada; Setsu Sakamoto; Tsuneo Saga; Tatsuya Higashi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  The flip-flop fungus sign: an FDG PET/CT sign of benignity.

Authors:  Alex A Nagelschneider; Stephen M Broski; William P Holland; David E Midthun; Anne-Marie Sykes; Val J Lowe; Patrick J Peller; Geoffrey B Johnson
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-01

4.  Functional imaging of lung cancer using dual energy CT: how does iodine related attenuation correlate with standardized uptake value of 18FDG-PET-CT?

Authors:  G Schmid-Bindert; Thomas Henzler; T Q Chu; M Meyer; J W Nance; U J Schoepf; D J Dinter; P Apfaltrer; R Krissak; C Manegold; S O Schoenberg; C Fink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Validation of functional imaging as a biomarker for radiation treatment response.

Authors:  C Jentsch; B Beuthien-Baumann; E G C Troost; G Shakirin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung by metabolomic analysis of tissue-serum pairs.

Authors:  K W Jordan; C B Adkins; L Su; E F Halpern; E J Mark; D C Christiani; L L Cheng
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Reproducibility and uptake time dependency of volume-based parameters on FDG-PET for lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomoka Kitao; Kenji Hirata; Katsumi Shima; Takashi Hayashi; Mitsunori Sekizawa; Toshiki Takei; Wataru Ichimura; Masao Harada; Keishi Kondo; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Thoracic positron emission tomography: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and beyond.

Authors:  Timothy J Jaykel; Michael S Clark; Daniel A Adamo; Brain T Welch; Scott M Thompson; Jason R Young; Eric C Ehman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Functional imaging in lung cancer.

Authors:  S W Harders; S Balyasnikowa; B M Fischer
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.273

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.