Literature DB >> 12690860

Cementless revision for infection following total hip arthroplasty.

Philip A Mitchell1, Bassam A Masri, Donald S Garbuz, Nelson V Greidanus, Clive P Duncan.   

Abstract

Eradication of chronic infection complicating total hip arthroplasty requires removal of all infected, devitalized and foreign tissue, including the arthroplasty components. Reimplantation into a sterile bed is the goal of treatment in most patients and successful reimplantation yields better functional results than excision arthroplasty. Reimplantation may be performed at the same stage as débridement as part of a single-stage procedure, using cemented components with antibiotic-loaded cement. Alternatively, a two-stage procedure may be performed so that the débridement and reimplantation are separated by a period of antibiotic delivery, both locally and systemically. The results of these treatment regimens and the rationale for cementless reconstruction at the second stage of a two-stage treatment protocol are important considerations in the treatment of periprosthetic infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12690860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Cementless two-staged total hip arthroplasty with a short term interval period for chronic deep periprosthetic infection. Technique and long-term results.

Authors:  Jochen Erhart; Karl Jaklitsch; Mark Schurz; Vilmos Vécsei; Reinhard Ehall
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  [Two-stage procedure to exchange septic total hip arthroplasties with late periprosthetic infection. Early results after implantation of a reverse modular hybrid endoprosthesis].

Authors:  G Walter; M Bühler; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeppe Lange; Anders Troelsen; Reimar W Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 5.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.