Heiko Becher1, Silke Schmidt, Jenny Chang-Claude. 1. University of Heidelberg, Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. heiko.becher@urz.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of environmental/lifestyle factors on breast cancer risk may be modified by genetic predisposition. METHODS: In a population-based case-control-family study performed in Germany including 706 cases by age 50 years, 1381 population, and 252 sister controls, we investigated main effects for environmental/lifestyle factors and genetic susceptibility and gene-environment interaction (G x E). Different surrogate measures for genetic predisposition using pedigree information were used: first-degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer; and gene carrier probability using a genetic model based on rare dominant genes. Possible G x E interaction was studied by (1) logistic regression using cases and population controls including an interaction term; (2) comparing results using sister controls and population controls; (3) case-only analysis with logistic regression and (4) a mixture logistic model. RESULTS: Familial predisposition showed the strongest main effect and the estimated gene carrier probability gave the best fit. High parity and longer duration of breastfeeding reduced breast cancer risk significantly, a history of abortions increased risk and age at menarche showed no significant effect. We found significant G x E interaction between parity and genetic susceptibility using different surrogate measures. In women most likely to have a high genetic susceptibility, high parity was less protective. Later age at menarche was protective in women with a positive family history. No evidence for G x E interaction was found for breastfeeding and abortion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings corroborate results from other studies and provide further evidence that the magnitude of protection from parity is reduced in women most likely to have a genetic risk in spite of the limitations of using surrogate genetic measures.
BACKGROUND: The effect of environmental/lifestyle factors on breast cancer risk may be modified by genetic predisposition. METHODS: In a population-based case-control-family study performed in Germany including 706 cases by age 50 years, 1381 population, and 252 sister controls, we investigated main effects for environmental/lifestyle factors and genetic susceptibility and gene-environment interaction (G x E). Different surrogate measures for genetic predisposition using pedigree information were used: first-degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer; and gene carrier probability using a genetic model based on rare dominant genes. Possible G x E interaction was studied by (1) logistic regression using cases and population controls including an interaction term; (2) comparing results using sister controls and population controls; (3) case-only analysis with logistic regression and (4) a mixture logistic model. RESULTS: Familial predisposition showed the strongest main effect and the estimated gene carrier probability gave the best fit. High parity and longer duration of breastfeeding reduced breast cancer risk significantly, a history of abortions increased risk and age at menarche showed no significant effect. We found significant G x E interaction between parity and genetic susceptibility using different surrogate measures. In women most likely to have a high genetic susceptibility, high parity was less protective. Later age at menarche was protective in women with a positive family history. No evidence for G x E interaction was found for breastfeeding and abortion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings corroborate results from other studies and provide further evidence that the magnitude of protection from parity is reduced in women most likely to have a genetic risk in spite of the limitations of using surrogate genetic measures.
Authors: Gillian S Dite; Robert J MacInnis; Adrian Bickerstaffe; James G Dowty; Roger L Milne; Antonis C Antoniou; Prue Weideman; Carmel Apicella; Graham G Giles; Melissa C Southey; Mark A Jenkins; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Aung Ko Win; Mary Beth Terry; John L Hopper Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Esther M John; Mary Beth Terry; Theresa H M Keegan; Angela R Bradbury; Julia A Knight; Wendy K Chung; Caren J Frost; Lothar Lilge; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Alice S Whittemore; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Irene L Andrulis Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Mary Beth Terry; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Mary B Daly; Esther M John; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; David E Goldgar; Julia A Knight; Alice S Whittemore; Wendy K Chung; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Mary Beth Terry; Theresa H M Keegan; Lauren C Houghton; Mandy Goldberg; Irene L Andrulis; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ying Wei; Alice S Whittemore; Angeline Protacio; Angela R Bradbury; Wendy K Chung; Julia A Knight; Esther M John Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 6.466