Literature DB >> 12689455

The impact of perceived tinnitus severity on health-related quality of life with aspects of gender.

Soly I. Erlandsson1, Kajsa-Mia Holgers.   

Abstract

The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) has been used to investigate the health profiles in different medical conditions. It has, however, never been applied to tinnitus sufferers. The present study aimed at investigating relationships between the perceived severity of tinnitus, audiometric data, age, gender and non-disease specific health-related quality of life measured with the NHP divided into two sections; NHP I (topics related to health status) and NHP II (health induced problems in daily life). These parameters were statistically analysed to identify predictive factors to the perceived severity of tinnitus, described by the Tinnitus Severity Questionnaire (TSQ). A total of 186 consecutive tinnitus patients (57 females and 129 males) attending an audiological specialist clinic in Sweden were included in the study. The stepwise regression model used explained 37.8 per cent of the variance in the perceived severity of tinnitus, and the significant predictors were: "Emotions", "Sleep", and "Pain", three of the six dimensions of the NHP I. Differences between gender were found in NHP II and age-related differences emerged in NHP I when male and female patients were compared to normal controls.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12689455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  18 in total

1.  The comparison of acoustic and psychic parameters of subjective tinnitus.

Authors:  Erkan Karatas; Murat Deniz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Psychological comorbidity in patients with chronic tinnitus: analysis and comparison with chronic pain, asthma or atopic dermatitis patients.

Authors:  N Zirke; C Seydel; A J Szczepek; H Olze; H Haupt; B Mazurek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The differential effect of low- versus high-frequency random noise stimulation in the treatment of tinnitus.

Authors:  Kathleen Joos; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The impact of co-morbid factors on the psychological outcome of tinnitus patients.

Authors:  Anna Maria Pajor; Elżbieta Agata Ormezowska; Magdalena Jozefowicz-Korczynska
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Differences Among Patients That Make Their Tinnitus Worse or Better.

Authors:  Tao Pan; Richard S Tyler; Haihong Ji; Claudia Coelho; Stephanie A Gogel
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Behavioral Animal Model of the Emotional Response to Tinnitus and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Gail Larkin; Aikeen Jones; Bradford J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-18

7.  Prefrontal cortex based sex differences in tinnitus perception: same tinnitus intensity, same tinnitus distress, different mood.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Kathleen Joos; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of Age, Gender and Hearing Loss on the Degree of Discomfort Due to Tinnitus.

Authors:  Maryam Noroozian; Zahra Jafari; Elaheh Shahmiri; Shaghayegh Omidvar; Azadeh Zendehbad; Naser Amini; Mahsa Radmehr; Masoud Bagherian; Ali Yoonessi
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

9.  The potential interruptive effect of tinnitus-related distress on attention.

Authors:  Sook Ling Leong; Stephanie Tchen; Ian H Robertson; Ola Alsalman; Wing Ting To; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Brain areas controlling heart rate variability in tinnitus and tinnitus-related distress.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.