Andrea Bubka1, Frederick Bonato. 1. Department of Psychology, Saint Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ 07306, USA. bubka_a@spc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Under optokinetic drum conditions, a stationary participant views the patterned interior of a rotating drum. Quickly, most participants perceive illusory self-rotation in the direction opposite to the drum's true rotation (vection). It has been documented that up to 60% of participants experience motion sickness-like symptoms under optokinetic conditions perhaps because of conflicting sensory information from the visual and vestibular systems. METHODS: Keeping rotation speed constant (10 RPM), drum tilt relative to the axis of rotation was systematically manipulated (0 degrees, 5 degrees, 10 degrees), producing a wobble effect. Overall well-being and eight motion sickness symptoms were assessed every 2 min using subjective scales. RESULTS: Participants reported 1) a complex type of circular vection that included a "wobble" or "sway" component and 2) a quicker onset of motion sickness-like symptoms as tilt increased. CONCLUSION: In a tilted drum, the vestibular system correctly indicates that the participant is stationary while the visual system indicates a complex type of self-rotation. This type of sensory conflict is more severe than what takes place under typical optokinetic drum conditions (no tilt). Results suggest that as visual/vestibular sensory conflict increases, so does the speed at which motion sickness symptoms occur.
BACKGROUND: Under optokinetic drum conditions, a stationary participant views the patterned interior of a rotating drum. Quickly, most participants perceive illusory self-rotation in the direction opposite to the drum's true rotation (vection). It has been documented that up to 60% of participants experience motion sickness-like symptoms under optokinetic conditions perhaps because of conflicting sensory information from the visual and vestibular systems. METHODS: Keeping rotation speed constant (10 RPM), drum tilt relative to the axis of rotation was systematically manipulated (0 degrees, 5 degrees, 10 degrees), producing a wobble effect. Overall well-being and eight motion sickness symptoms were assessed every 2 min using subjective scales. RESULTS:Participants reported 1) a complex type of circular vection that included a "wobble" or "sway" component and 2) a quicker onset of motion sickness-like symptoms as tilt increased. CONCLUSION: In a tilted drum, the vestibular system correctly indicates that the participant is stationary while the visual system indicates a complex type of self-rotation. This type of sensory conflict is more severe than what takes place under typical optokinetic drum conditions (no tilt). Results suggest that as visual/vestibular sensory conflict increases, so does the speed at which motion sickness symptoms occur.
Authors: Lauren T LaCount; Riccardo Barbieri; Kyungmo Park; Jieun Kim; Emery N Brown; Braden Kuo; Vitaly Napadow Journal: Aviat Space Environ Med Date: 2011-04
Authors: James K Ruffle; Anya Patel; Vincent Giampietro; Matthew A Howard; Gareth J Sanger; Paul L R Andrews; Steven C R Williams; Qasim Aziz; Adam D Farmer Journal: J Physiol Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Adam D Farmer; Vin F Ban; Steven J Coen; Gareth J Sanger; Gareth J Barker; Michael A Gresty; Vincent P Giampietro; Steven C Williams; Dominic L Webb; Per M Hellström; Paul L R Andrews; Qasim Aziz Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 5.182