Literature DB >> 12687874

Transfemoral pediatric permanent pacing: long-term results.

Roberto Costa1, Martino Martinelli Filho, Wagner Tetsuji Tamaki, Elizabeth Sartorio Crevelari, Silvana D'ório Nishioka, Luiz Felipe Pinho Moreira, Sérgio Almeida Oliveira.   

Abstract

The femoral vein has been used as an alternative conduit to implant pacemakers in children of any weight. Such method associates endocardial pacing and good cosmetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively, since 1981, the long-term follow-up of 99 children, from newborn to 13 years old (average = 4.1 +/- 3.6 years, 56 girls), who underwent the implantation of pacemakers via the femoral vein. Atrioventricular block was present in 88% of patients, of congenital etiology in 39% and postoperative in 54%. Single chamber pacemakers were implanted in 92% of patients. During a mean follow-up of 5.3 +/- 5.0 years (maximum = 18.2 years), 5 patients died of cardiac causes, 4 of infection, 2 suddenly, and 3 of unknown causes. The 5-, 10- and 15-year actuarial survival rates were 83.7%, 75.7%, and 75.7%, respectively. Transfemoral leads were used for a mean of 48.9 +/- 44.0 months. Reasons for lead explantations were pacing failure in five patients, infection in eight, and elective in nine. The 2-, 5- and 10-year actuarial survivals of transfemoral leads were 87.6%, 73.8%, and 31.8%, respectively. The mean lead survival was 97 months. Overall, 105 reoperations were performed, 38 for battery depletion, 24 for body growth, 14 for infection or pocket revisions, and 27 for miscellaneous reasons. In conclusion, the durability and overall long-term performance of transfemoral leads were excellent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687874     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00078.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Permanent pacing in patients without upper limb venous access: a review of current techniques.

Authors:  Swee-Chong Seow; Toon-Wei Lim; Devinder Singh; Wee-Tiong Yeo; Pipin Kojodjojo
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-11-27

2.  Endocardial pacemaker implantation in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Canan Ayabakan; Eric Rosenthal
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-04-01

3.  Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block.

Authors:  Roberto Costa; Katia Regina da Silva; Martino Martinelli Filho; Roger Carrillo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Unusual site of permanent pacing: a case report.

Authors:  Rakesh Yadav; Sharad Chandra; Nitish Naik; Cm Nagesh; Ss Kothari
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2009-03-15

5.  The long-term outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices implanted via the femoral route.

Authors:  Samuel Griffiths; Jonathan M Behar; Daniel B Kramer; Mike T Debney; Christopher Monkhouse; Alicia Y Lefas; Martin Lowe; Fouad Amin; Emily Cantor; Vennela Boyalla; Nabeela Karim; Jan Till; Vias Markides; Jonathan R Clague; Tom Wong
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.