Literature DB >> 12687833

Prognostic significance of serial P wave signal-averaged electrocardiograms following external electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective study.

Xiao Hua Guo1, Mark Michael Gallagher, Jan Poloniecki, Gang Yi, A John Camm.   

Abstract

The authors hypothesized that the persistence of abnormal atrial conduction detected by serial P wave signal-averaged electrocardiograms (P-SAECGs) can identify patients who are at high risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation (R-AF) following electrical cardioversion (ECV). P-SAECGs were recorded in 60 consecutive patients after ECV (53 men, age 66 +/- 10 years) and repeated in those who had remained in sinus rhythm (SR) 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months later. Filtered P wave duration (PD), root mean square (RMS) voltage of the terminal 40, 30, 20 ms (RMS-40, RMS-30, RMS-20) of the filtered P wave, RMS voltage of the entire filtered P wave (RMS-p), and the integral of the voltages in the entire P wave (integral-p) were analyzed. Thirty-one (52%) patients returned to AF within 1 week, an additional 11 (18%) by 1 month, and a further 2 (3.3%) at each subsequent assessment (3 and 6 months). The patients with R-AF had longer PD (157 +/- 24 vs 143 +/- 17 ms, P < 0.0001) and lower RMS-40, RMS-30, RMS-20 (5.3 +/- 2.0 vs 6.1 +/- 3.4 microV, P = 0.007; 4.3 +/- 1.5 vs 5.7 +/- 3.2 microV, P < 0.0001; 3.6 +/- 1.4 vs 5.2 +/- 3.0 microV, P < 0.0001, respectively) than those who remained in SR. These measurements did not change significantly in either group. RMS-p increased in SR patients (P = 0.009) but decreased in those who subsequently reverted to AF (P = 0.032) with a significant difference between the slopes of the RMS-p change (P = 0.006). Integral-p decreased from the time of ECV in the R-AF group only (P = 0.0028) and created a significant difference between the two slopes (P = 0.0004). The evolution of P-SAECG parameters after ECV differs in patients whose AF recurs versus patients who remain in SR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687833     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Prediction of the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion with P wave signal-averaged ECG.

Authors:  Marco Budeus; Marcus Hennersdorf; Christian Perings; Heinrich Wieneke; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Sack
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Usefulness of P-wave signal averaging to predict atrial fibrillation recurrences after electrical cardioversion.

Authors:  Coralie Blanche; Nam Tran; David Carballo; Fabio Rigamonti; Haran Burri; Marc Zimmermann
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  P-wave abnormality predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hanney Gonna; Mark Michael Gallagher; Xiao Hua Guo; Yee Guan Yap; Katerina Hnatkova; A John Camm
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Limited Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Preprocedure Reverse Remodelling.

Authors:  David Slotwiner; Jonathan Steinberg
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-08-30

5.  P-wave Variability and Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Federica Censi; Ivan Corazza; Elisa Reggiani; Giovanni Calcagnini; Eugenio Mattei; Michele Triventi; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.