Literature DB >> 12687439

A new minimally invasive posterior approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy: surgical technique and preliminary results.

H Boehm1, R Greiner-Perth, H El-Saghir, Y Allam.   

Abstract

Degenerative cervical disorders predominantly lead to anterior spinal cord compression (by bony spurs at the posterior margin of the vertebral body or by degenerated disc), which may be central and/or foraminal. In a smaller percentage of cases, there is encroachment of the canal mainly from posterior by bulging yellow ligaments or bony appositions, resulting in compression syndromes of roots or spinal cord. The aim of this work is to present a minimally invasive posterior approach avoiding detachment of muscles for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Thirteen patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy (four patients) or myelopathy (nine patients) were operated according to this technique. In principle, the technique secures access to the diseased spinal segment via a percutaneously placed working channel (11 mm outer diameter and 9 mm inner diameter). The cervical paraspinal muscles are not deflected, but just spread between their fibres by special dilators. All further steps are performed through this channel under control of three-dimensional vision through the operating microscope. The mean follow-up period was 17 months (one patient died 9 months postoperatively), and patients were evaluated using a modified version of the Oswestry Index, called the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain. The mean NDI (P<0.0001) improved from 13.2 (preoperatively) to 4.8 (postoperatively). The VAS for arm pain (P<0.001) and for neck pain (P<0.001) also showed marked postoperative improvement. Complete recovery of the preoperative neurological deficit was found in four patients, while the remaining eight patients showed improvement of the neurological symptoms during the follow-up period. There were no intra-operative or postoperative complications and no re-operation. The preliminary experience with this technique, and the good clinical outcome, seem to promise that this minimally invasive technique is a valid alternative to the conventional open exposure for treatment of lateral disc prolapses, foraminal bony stenosis and central posterior ligamentous stenosis of the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687439      PMCID: PMC3615500          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0522-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  8 in total

1.  A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Selective dorsal decompression of degenerative cervical canal stenosis].

Authors:  C Schulz; U Kunz; U M Mauer; R Mathieu
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Ultrasonographic quantification of spinal cord and dural pulsations during cervical laminoplasty in patients with compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Atsushi Kimura; Atsushi Seichi; Hirokazu Inoue; Teruaki Endo; Michiyoshi Sato; Takahiro Higashi; Yuichi Hoshino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice.

Authors:  Cees J Vos; Arianne P Verhagen; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of Microendoscopic Laminotomy (MEL) Versus Spinous Process-Splitting Laminotomy (SPSL) for Multi Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Ryunosuke Oyama; Takeshi Arizono; Akihiko Inokuchi; Ryuta Imamura; Takahiro Hamada; Hirofumi Bekki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-09

6.  Cervical foraminal selective nerve root block: a 'two-needle technique' with results.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Veda Gowda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A Novel Technique for Cervical Microscopic Foraminotomy Utilizing Spinous Process Splitting: Microscopic Mini-Open Foraminotomy.

Authors:  Shota Ikegami; Masashi Uehara; Yoshinari Miyaoka; Shugo Kuraishi; Hiroki Oba; Ryo Munakata; Takashi Takizawa; Takayuki Kamanaka; Terue Hatakenaka; Jun Takahashi
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-30

8.  Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Hur; Jin-Sung Kim; Myeong-Hoon Shin; Kyeong-Sik Ryu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-03-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.