Literature DB >> 12686849

Long-term followup of pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty: how long is long enough?

K Psooy1, J G Pike, M P Leonard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined followup for pediatric patients after pyeloplasty based on the risk of late complications and the likelihood of return if discharged early from followup.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty at a single center between 1986 and 1996. Data regarding recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction and symptoms suggesting possibly recurrent obstruction were assessed.
RESULTS: During the select period 123 pyeloplasties were performed. A total of 77 renal units were followed greater than 5 years. At 1 year postoperatively diuretic renograms showed normal drainage in 87% of the cases and prolonged or incomplete drainage in 13%. Obstruction recurred 8 years postoperatively in only 1 renal unit (0.8% overall, 1.3% of those followed greater than 5 years). Symptoms suggestive of recurrent obstruction developed in 18% of the patients but represented true recurrence in only 1. If one were to consider early followup discharge for these patients, the probability of repeat referral due to such symptoms was significantly higher in year 1 than in year 3. Most symptoms were initially assessed with ultrasound.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction is unlikely after unobstructed postoperative diuretic renogram and does not warrant long term followup. Ideal followup would extend to 2 years, covering the period when an initial symptom of recurrence is most likely to present and enabling baseline unobstructed renal ultrasound to be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12686849     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055040.19568.ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years.

Authors:  Punit Bansal; Aman Gupta; Ritesh Mongha; Srinivas Narayan; Ranjit K Das; Malay Bera; Sudip C Chakraborty; Anup K Kundu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; Thomas S Lendvay; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  National Trends in Followup Imaging after Pyeloplasty in Children in the United States.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Thomas S Lendvay; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Trends in followup imaging after adult pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Sanjeet Kumar Singh; Sohrab Arora; Varun Mittal; Nitesh Patidar; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; M S Ansari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Optimal Length of Follow-up for the Detection of Unsuccessful Pediatric Pyeloplasty: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Utsav K Bansal; Pankaj P Dangle; Heidi Stephany; Asad Durrani; Glenn Cannon; Francis X Schneck; Michael C Ost
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Follow-up after pyeloplasty: How long?

Authors:  T J Nirmal; J C Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-07

8.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.

Authors:  Punit Bansal; Aman Gupta; Ritesh Mongha; Srinivas Narayan; A K Kundu; S C Chakraborty; R K Das; M K Bera
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in children - long-term outcomes, how long follow up is necessary?

Authors:  Marcin Polok; Wojciech Apoznański
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-09-09

Review 10.  Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hamdan Hammad Alhazmi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.