Literature DB >> 12686294

Rheologic properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins.

In-Bog Lee1, Ho-Hyun Son, Chung-Moon Um.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This research was undertaken to investigate the viscoelastic properties related to handling characteristics of five commercial flowable, two conventional hybrid and two condensable composite resins and to investigate the effect on the viscosity of filler volume fraction of composites.
METHODS: A dynamic oscillatory shear test was used to evaluate the storage shear modulus (G'), loss shear modulus (G"), loss tangent (tan delta) and complex viscosity (eta(*)) of the composite resins as a function of frequency (omega)-dynamic frequency sweep test from 0.01 to 100 rad/s at 25 degrees C-using an Advanced Rheometric Expansion System. To investigate the effect on the viscosity of the composites of the filler volume fraction, the filler weight% and filler volume% were measured by the Archimedes' principle using a pyknometer.
RESULTS: The complex viscosity eta(*) of flowable composites was lower than that of the hybrid composites and significant differences were observed between brands. The complex viscosity eta(*) of condensable composites was higher than that of hybrid composites. The order of complex viscosity eta(*) at omega=10 rad/s in order of decreasing viscosity was as follows, Synergy compact, P-60, Z-250, Z-100, Aeliteflo, Tetric flow, Compoglass flow, Flow it and Revolution. The complex viscosity of flowable composites, normalized with respect to Z-100, was 0.04-0.56 but Synergy compact was 2.158 times higher than that of Z-100. The patterns of the change of loss tangent (tan delta) of the composite resins with increasing frequency were significantly different between brands. Phase angles delta ranged from 30.9 to 78.1 degrees at omega=10 rad/s. All composite resins exhibit pseudoplastic behavior with increasing shear rate. The relationships between the complex shear modulus G(*), the phase angle delta, and the shear rate omega were represented by the frequency domain phasor form, G(*)(omega)=G(*)e(i delta)=G(*) 90 degree angle delta. Only a weak relationship was found between filler volume% and the viscosity of the composite resins. SIGNIFICANCE: This investigation shows that the viscoelasticity of composites in the same class is significantly different between brands. This rheologic property of composite resins influences the handling characteristics of the materials. The locus of frequency domain phasor plots in a complex plane is a valuable method of representing the viscoelastic properties of composite resins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12686294     DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00058-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  12 in total

Review 1.  Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Kusai Baroudi; Jean C Rodrigues
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  T C Fagundes; T J E Barata; E Bresciani; D F G Cefaly; M F F Jorge; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of Practitioner-Related Placement Variables on the Compressive Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins-An In Vitro Clinical Simulation Study.

Authors:  Tamar Brosh; Moshe Davidovitch; Avi Berg; Aviran Shenhav; Raphael Pilo; Shlomo Matalon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Flavia Bittencourt Pazinatto; Ranulfo Gionordoli Neto; Linda Wang; José Mondelli; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  A comparison of viscoelastic properties of three root canal sealers.

Authors:  Sedigheh Khedmat; Fatemeh Momen-Heravi; Malihe Pishvaei
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31

6.  Effect of Pre-heating on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Dentin.

Authors:  Abdolrahim Davari; Alireza Daneshkazemi; Behnaz Behniafar; Mahsan Sheshmani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-09-30

7.  A comparative evaluation of microleakage of restorations using silorane-based dental composite and methacrylate-based dental composites in Class II cavities: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Jambai Sampath Kumar Sivakumar; A S Prasad; Saravanapriyan Soundappan; N Ragavendran; R Ajay; Krishnamoorthy Santham
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016-10

8.  A 1-year comparative evaluation of clinical performance of nanohybrid composite with Activa™ bioactive composite in Class II carious lesion: A randomized control study.

Authors:  Dhaval Bhadra; Nimisha C Shah; Ajay Singh Rao; Meetkumar S Dedania; Namrata Bajpai
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb

9.  Comparative evaluation of Rheological characteristics of Giomers and other Nano-flowable resin composites in vitro.

Authors:  Loulwa M Al-Saud
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2021-11-08

10.  Comparison of the rheological properties of four root canal sealers.

Authors:  Seok Woo Chang; Young-Kyu Lee; Qiang Zhu; Won Jun Shon; Woo Cheol Lee; Kee Yeon Kum; Seung Ho Baek; In Bog Lee; Bum-Soon Lim; Kwang Shik Bae
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.